No. There are test mints that let you mint for free but you can do the same in real mints. There is no chain, custodian (trusted third party that issues ecash) decides the rules.
NIP 60 is the best way to lose money on nostr.
nostr:nevent1qqs2tlc6swjrssp8pzaud0zmgtxdtrr5tnznggqcz7w9v3tarfw7j3qpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hsyg86np9a0kajstc8u9h846rmy6320wdepdeydfz8w8cv7kh9sqv02gpsgqqqqqqs43ykn2
Some people are selling me custodial solutions.
nostr:nevent1qqspywza9u3q8076qp6ruemvnd5etaeednd3ngu56dq2e6x6wapaq4qpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3q2rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sxpqqqqqqz0zycsh
"Regardless of the maximum size of a single transaction, a CJ anonymity set can be made arbitrarily large (bounded, of course, by participants) by building a multi-stage switching network out of joins." - Greg Maxwell
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/77765
84 outputs are below 65k sats. There are better ways to increase anonset in a transaction without increasing number of inputs/outputs, belonging to small number of users and some of them being dust.
This method of mixing will become obsolete with joinpools after covenants.
How about doing an online event in which you can share these ideas?
I want to organize an online event focused on bitcoin privacy. Since it will be online there is no cost for flights, hotel etc. We could do presentations, workshops, discussions etc. and even anons can participate.
No custodial stuff though.
If you are working on anything related to bitcoin privacy, would you be interested in participating in such event?
nostr:nevent1qqspl3k0d784a4hw4fauyvq4zjfz2u0x0c5y2c3376209quheq2t0gsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsxdqfx3t8ywjx5rfx0es0xgqr0hy6mhs6e0q4nm9s37ex4r3n49kgrqsqqqqqpm67eqp
How about doing an online event in which you can share these ideas?
I want to organize an online event focused on bitcoin privacy. Since it will be online there is no cost for flights, hotel etc. We could do presentations, workshops, discussions etc. and even anons can participate.
No custodial stuff though.
Added the steps to test android app: https://docs.joinstr.xyz/users/using-joinstr
You can get NIP 5 address ending with joinstr.xyz if you test this app and share your feedback.
1. I do not care what people think about me because the software works without me
2. It has implementations in 3 languages: python, kotlin and rust. Mobile app for android, ios and desktop apps are being used at the moment.
3. It does have sybil resistance using curve trees
nostr:note1rq4yruadusx85jp8pmsmxn59fguvzxatsqqzur98rdj7u0ken3ksq502sr
1. I do not care what people think about me because the software works without me
2. It has implementations in 3 languages: python, kotlin and rust. Mobile app for android, ios and desktop apps are being used at the moment.
3. It does have sybil resistance using curve trees
nostr:note1rq4yruadusx85jp8pmsmxn59fguvzxatsqqzur98rdj7u0ken3ksq502sr
NEW RELEASE
v0.1.1 for joinstr: https://gitlab.com/invincible-privacy/joinstr-kmp/-/releases/v0.1.1
Changes
===============
- Improve UI
- Remove BIP 32 derivation paths from signed PSBT
- Wallet selection in settings
- Riseup VPN implementation
- Support Testnet and Mainnet
- Fix fee rate estimation
Review the code, verify APK, test it and share your feedback. Join simplex chat group if you need signet coins and other peers for testing.
Easiest thing would be to allow free access for 2 minutes for every device and they can pay with lightning for more time.
https://www.boltcard.org/ can also be used for such payments.
- Please read the tweet I replied to so that you understand the context of 'upgrades'
- Mints are third parties who custody bitcoin for users that may or may not use LN nodes. I have experimented enough and running a mint: https://thismoneydoesnotexist.lol
- It is possible with LN
> You can also use e-cash non custodially if you run your own mint
Running your own mint, using it to mint ecash for yourself does not improve privacy. You might as well run LN node instead and use LN with self custody.
Recipient needs to be online for redeeming e-cash if its issues by untrusted mint.
> though I want to have e-cash if I must use a custodian
Why do you need a custodian in the first place? Whole point of creating bitcoin was to create e-cash with no trusted third parties. You can read old discussions on mailing lists, whitepaper and initial website.
> Users of lightning can benefit from the liquidity without using custodians themselves
AFAIK e-cash is used for small amount. Lightning already gets enough liquidity from boltz swaps, centralized exchanges etc. Ark and Mercury could provide more liquidity in the future without involving trusted third parties.
Yes I was responding to someone on twitter at the same time so wrote "tweet" instead of post. It is possible and shared multiple times in this thread DYOR.
Notes by 1440000bytes | export