While I agree with your analysis I don’t see him espousing anything significantly deviating from
standard bitcoiner talking points.
Which ideas do you find problematic?
yea seems offbase...i have you to thank for learning
"there is no red. there is no blue.
there is the state and there is you."
I dont think its a controversial take to say a Trump presidency MAY be easier for bitcoiners in the short term though. but politicians lie and Trump + Vance both fucked up bad during the plandemic.
the general position is that by voting you are playing into the charade. not voting is refusing to buy into their frame of false choice.
on another level by voting you are placing yourself below another man and claiming that they represent you because you are incapable of doing so yourself--but thats a deep rabbithole. that @DarthCoin can speak to much better than I can.
You are choosing someone to represent you. Delegating your power to another.
Not saying I believe all this just stating the positions as I’ve read them.
it's a simple case:
0% chance Ross is Free with Kamala
> 0% chance Ross is Free with Trump
For what is a meaningless vote, the 2nd option is patently less meaningless and Ross may never have a better chance than this.
its great that you can monetize a fantastic service and deal with scammers at the same time. $100 is a fair price for first world nations but it may cause DIY users in poorer countries from getting quality support that keep them running their node when facing a tech issue.
Its a difficult line to draw and you had to draw it somewhere.
The cream rises to the top. I think after @Start9 ‘s next release that includes easy ways to safely expose services to clearnet, it will get a massive boost in usage.
awesome release and very cool to see zap.store develop into a full fledged app store. it would be awesome to have support for shizuku so I can update all my apps with 1 click instead of clicking on each one!
some good insights, it just falls apart at funding those progressive policies. Are there any progressive theories on how to fund these without taking what belongs to your neighbor? it seems implicit that these should be funded through govt theft. Happy to be corrected though.
Are the progressives that are dipping their toes into bitcoin are just at the top of the rabbithole of private property?
you can easily make as many email addresses as you want and just forward them to your main. No idea how some arbitrary email address is tantamount to KYC?
Top 3?
I've had a few sessions of flipping through one with the iphone image to text feature on and getting more recipes for the stash without adding to "the problem."
this is great not only for existing users but also for dispelling the myth that coldcards are only for advanced bitcoiners. excellent job!
nostr:nevent1qqsx9g7yat6j0sfhda7qaehg850wguvz4uy4sutyvl6j2znn3wm2lmspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygzkzu448aesw595pe3u2qd3vp5dm94zghnlq4gkwhq0ajvp0m5kuqrmf7nn
they were dead either way. At least they get a bigger payday on the way.
No one thought about em before and now people hate em but they get paid. Probably worth it in their eyes.
Notes by konstantine | export