I’m just trying to figure out what you’re saying. How broad of a statement are you trying to make? You’re posting this on nostr, which i feel some people use nefariously, and whose creators - depending on what you mean by the word - "allow" it to be used that way.
Seems like it could be a lot more readable by allowing for ink that is roughly between the corners. For example - a dip down the middle of the “m” to enable a right-side up “n” and thereby a normal “u”
From Reddit:
This particular chasuble was made as a gift to be worn by the Pope during his trip to Peru. As such the maker decided to put something that is "Peruvian" with that thing being an image from the Nazca line. And that basically is the reason. A kitsch artistic motif to be sure but it's neutral and the image has no implied ulterior meaning anyway to modern onlookers. I dont like it but purely for aesthetical reasons.
What kinda of identical and objetive rules would you be ok with? What kinds would you not be ok with? I’m guessing AI would come up with some we wouldn’t like.
Or did peppers just play the game better than nearly any other?
Reminds me of this quote:
Ten thousand years ago wheat was just a wild grass, one of many, confined to a small range in the Middle East. Suddenly, within just a few short millennia, it was growing all over the world. According to the basic evolutionary criteria of survival and reproduction, wheat has become one of the most successful plants in the history of the earth.
- Yuval Noah Harai
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by Hexaduvo | export