That's excellent progress!
I've become increasingly more enthusiastic about script restoration, specifically the stark constructions this opens up.
Thanks a lot for pushing this forward!
It's really incredible what can be done with Bitcoin script.
Taproot is such a gamechanger.
nostr:nevent1qqsg7l3gy33vvlsqrctzyyul3hyluch0u6vxndlnncg68ul93u4lx8spzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyqat0ssss5jt05wpckzlp8qm0cv57hnlyfd9hw287duwqaxhf6wm7qcyqqqqqqgnmk0lr
It's basically slashtags from nostr:nprofile1qqsgeksa4tajm7x673gq2v7t56dkgkh6pjhhzdhrgxlpke4za8jmmkqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgjwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhqct89ejhxqgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucnpdejqetk0p4
This is a really really really wild story, we are standing on top of unknown giants.
nostr:naddr1qq2kjvj3w9m56vmewav9x73ngfzy63n9w9grvq3qaljazgxlpnpfp7n5sunlk3dvfp72456x6nezjw4sd850q879rxqsxpqqqp65w6fj2yn
A monopoly is defined by utilizing aggression to keep new entrepreneurs from providing a service in the market.
Since bitcoin miners are anonymous, and since they only need compute power to provide a service, bitcoin mining is hardcore anti-monopoly, or in other words, a radical free market.
Whenever there is no opportunity for monopoly, new entrepreneurs can always sweep in to provide the service, even if there's only a tiny bit of profit possible. Thus the price for the good (hash price) will tend towards the marginal cost of production, so that there's very little profit opportunities, meaning if you're not incredibly efficient and provide the hash at very low cost, you are likely unprofitable and just burning your money.
Glad you enjoyed the book!
By the way, this was written 1997-2001, and was first published in 2002, the second edition is from 2007 with mainly style changes.
First the book was published anonymous, later Paul attributed himself to it (and you can rather easily verify by checking his other writings published at the time and after).
I found the book years ago, and did the audiobook recently.
tl;dr, property rights are a solution to the problem of requirement to allocate scarce resources.
Ideas are non-scarce, and if property rights are applied, then it's not protective, but in fact violates the property in actually scarce resources of peaceful people.
https://mises.org/library/book/against-intellectual-property
If Alice signs a contract that says Bob will deliver a good, but it's actually Charlie that signs it pretending to be Bob, den Charlie has stolen the money from Alice.
He has not stolen the image of the logo from Bob.
Going to give this a read.
I’m an artist. If I come up with some original characters, are you saying that I shouldn’t have the right to protect my creations? Shouldn’t be able to prevent others from trying to steal my art and then make money from it?
Huge!
That's a massive milestone, and shows your insane effort to build such an important project.
Thanks to all contributors to make this happen, you're heroes!! 💚
nostr:nprofile1qqszw70nm86zcl0wzlcwd0xulzdgl82e95v78vdm6fl0rnlarfle35gpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg4waehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsv0rdp9 how about adding multiple currencies in the same screen to satsprice
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by Max Hillebrand | export