i think that side of it is under-explored too. it’s interesting that unconscious effect likes and follow counts have on your perception.
i hate how sometimes my mind, by default, might give a post/comment on ig/twitter merit just because of how many likes it has.
@OpenSats@ODELL when you really think about it- airships are the bitcoin of aviation and they use PoW to propel themselves through the sky. please give lufta.org $1m :)
starting a movement.
just took a snapshot of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips- we activate every BIP listed by August or i set off a thermonuclear weapon in El Salvador.
‘We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because I am hard’ one of the best speeches of all time
have you considered that you’re retarded? even in a completely free, anarchic society you still have moral principles that are overwhelming shared.
you can expect that to be reflected within a public square- just like how someone might come up to you and push you off your soapbox.
this is how freedom is expresses itself in reality. with freedom you are preventing some arbitrary group having control over you, but individuals will do what they do.
why is that when you mention anything to do with scaling btc and different trade-offs, monerobros will come in to say ‘we’ve been telling you guys this the whole time’ as if they’re not in the exact same boat.
another interesting approach would be combining RSS feeds to make a timeline.
instead of pulling notes from relays, when you open your ‘algo’ feed, your client combines 10 RSS feeds i.e. top notes of the day, mentions popular movies, mentions xyz, which is made up of notes.
i’m kinda more interested in how nostr could build personalised feeds based off likes, and engagement like other platforms but it would be very difficult here.
Despite recent regulatory crackdowns against custodians and privacy, i think cashu has a good chance of success because of how easily mints can proliferate.
WoS, Phoenix, ZBD, Alby are much easier targets as they operate centrally around a company.
no they wouldn’t, even if it’s custodial it’s still a very elegant application of blind signatures for payments.
if it was somehow only proposed today you’d find they’d would just to try find a way to make it non-custodial probably
custodians are not the enemy retard- your priors are completely wrong.
interesting tho, id love to hear your mental gymnastics to rationalise why arbitrum/optimism/etc are fine when their bridge contracts are upgradable by a multisig. no-one seems to care that none of ethereum’s L2s are trustless despite being marketed like they are.
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by doot | export