We had a housewarming party yesterday. A lot of guests came over. I was apprehensive about it but it all ended up great (after a few beers). I didn't expect to have a good time but it was nice to see the extended family.
Making an estimation? Yeah. If they can tell if they're a child or not is easy. You can even tell my OC (do not STEAL) is an adult with the head to body proportion.
Maybe I am, but I was OK with bot's writer's answer and would have left it at that, but the rest of you retards come in thinking I'm some pedo, when we're talking about numbers and sight now. Bot refuses to answer my character's age, because I know she knows she can't tell age by sight.
No, we’re not arguing if whether we see the character is a child or not. We’ve established that. We’re arguing whether you can tell the age of the character. And if so, how.
No it's not. You can tell if the character is an adult or a child, but you can never tell its age. Bot told it's either eyes or writers. Writers is a solid answer, but she also said eyes, which I don't agree with.
What's dishonest about it? You said you could tell with your eyes what a character's age is. :(
I'm trying to challenge your statement of age and fictional characters, is all. I want to show you how it's not so cut and dry like you want it to be.
People can't put a number with eyes, that's not possible.
So it's writers, then.
OK.
But what if the writers says the character is 5000 years old? :think:
Not arguing about look here, we know that if the character is childlike it's probably a child. I'm talking about the number situation.
Who needs to make the explicit definition?
How about you give them the option to be highly insecure and put a button that says "I don't care about security, download as a text file" and it downloads the letters that way, so at least they can come back to their account without so much hassle.
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by Token | export