You shouldn't have joined the conversation, then. :ahmadinejadsmug:
@Token @Emoji @Mean Girl 💅 nah nigga you are being autistic for no reason, I know you want to "win" but you are doing it in the most retarded autistic way
Maybe I am, but I was OK with bot's writer's answer and would have left it at that, but the rest of you retards come in thinking I'm some pedo, when we're talking about numbers and sight now. Bot refuses to answer my character's age, because I know she knows she can't tell age by sight.
Nobody has accused you of being a pedophile. Do you ever look at loli p*rn?
@Token @Emoji @Mean Girl 💅 I will defer to this "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it"
You can't even tell a real person's age with sight, what makes you think you can tell a fictional one?
We’ve already covered “reasonable estimates of age”, which does count, even in courts. The genre of cp we’re talking about makes it obvious, that’s its entire purpose, to arouse pedophiles.
No we haven't covered that. New to me. and you just now pulling it out. I don't believe estimates count.
No point continuing this.
Because you know you’re wrong and you’re being btfo in real time.
You think age is an estimation. I don't. no one wins.
Do you agree most ppl can look at a person and make a reasonable estimate of their age? Particularly whether or not they’re a child? Yes or no.