Another proof of Lightning's privacy in sending is that you can quietly put tinted bitcoins into the Exchange (if it supports LN), if that is not proof enough.
I already announced months ago that for this reason LN would be banned on exchanges.
And here I finish, you can crucify me now. 🙃
nostr:note1af2qtdfw4g0kxkrmwg6kwllrfvwxryj4nfgrz8l0hgdu9237tl6shnmaxl
And something that many people forget, payments in Monero are still on a blockchain available for when there is a vulnerability in CT for example, payments in Lightning are not stored anywhere but in the log of the Wallets involved.
nostr:note1t9e96nsp8fxatp2sngpz60c07ytuh5r0xlgqxmu7dhg78v6axm8sr5uwxe
The theory is fine, Lightning has many possible vulnerabilities with respect to privacy but so does Monero, even Monero has been under attack and vulnerable for a long time.
Theory is fine but you have to put the attack into practice.
I feel that many of you here are aspergers and don't understand that things are not black and white.
To your regret, Lightning offers a good level of privacy for the sender and it is easy to get a good level of privacy for the receiver through swaps without having to resort to a shitcoin.
😉
😂 then you don't understand LN and you believe the bullshit told by influencers who have never used it in their fucking life.
Ask yourself why in Germany kraken a banned Lightning, something I predicted months ago.
I bet you a bitcoin if I make a payment to you and you find out who I am, in the same way if you make a payment to me you have to find out where that payment goes to the chain (here I will use something else besides lightning).
@DarthCoin will be the treasurer, come on?
I'm not asking you to tell me who I am, I'm just asking you to tell me from which node the payment comes from and to which address or chain the receiving payment ends up... 🙃
In these two notes I show that the Rothschilds have a stake in the Federal Reserve and that the Federal Reserve is a private entity, I do not say it, a legal court says it.
Now search about this information in the different “artificial intelligence” engines, they will tell you that the Rothschilds participation in the federal reserve is a conspiracy theory and that the federal reserve is not a private entity (mixed model blah blah blah).
Artificial intelligence is an opinion maker, it will only show you one version of history, don't use it to learn, it is a tool of mass control.
https://primal.net/e/note1xdt47pkdvt88wy2l67nu7mhf5d2nt9gv33chuyyc27krhnyjzkfsk99tv8https://primal.net/e/note1neplgapvtlyfal3fnl4z0wwm2jsrpcxsmgxqrn72m8k5xsrdc0dq65s48x
Chart of who "owns" the Federal Reserve
Published 1976
Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.
N.M. Rothschild , London - Bank of England
______________________________________
| |
| J. Henry Schroder
| Banking | Corp.
| |
Brown, Shipley - Morgan Grenfell - Lazard - |
& Company & Company Brothers |
| | | |
--------------------| -------| | |
| | | | | |
Alex Brown - Brown Bros. - Lord Mantagu - Morgan et Cie -- Lazard ---|
& Son | Harriman Norman | Paris Bros |
| | / | N.Y. |
| | | | | |
| Governor, Bank | J.P. Morgan Co -- Lazard ---|
| of England / N.Y. Morgan Freres |
| 1924-1938 / Guaranty Co. Paris |
| / Morgan Stanley Co. | /
| / | \Schroder Bank
| / | Hamburg/Berlin
| / Drexel & Company /
| / Philadelphia /
| / /
| / Lord Airlie
| / /
| / M. M. Warburg Chmn J. Henry Schroder
| | Hamburg --------- marr. Virginia F. Ryan
| | | grand-daughter of Otto
| | | Kahn of Kuhn Loeb Co.
| | |
| | |
Lehman Brothers N.Y -------------- Kuhn Loeb Co. N. Y.
| | --------------------------
µ
| | | |
8
| | | |
Lehman Brothers - Mont. Alabama Solomon Loeb Abraham Kuhn
| | __|______________________|_________
Lehman-Stern, New Orleans Jacob Schiff/Theresa Loeb Nina Loeb/Paul Warburg
------------------------- | | |
| | Mortimer Schiff James Paul Warburg
_____________|_______________/ |
| | | | |
Mayer Lehman | Emmanuel Lehman \
| | | \
Herbert Lehman Irving Lehman \
| | | \
Arthur Lehman \ Phillip Lehman John Schiff/Edith Brevoort Baker
/ | Present Chairman Lehman Bros
/ Robert Owen Lehman Kuhn Loeb - Granddaughter of
/ | George F. Baker
| / |
| / |
| / Lehman Bros Kuhn Loeb (1980)
| / |
| / Thomas Fortune Ryan
| | |
| | |
Federal Reserve Bank Of New York |
|||||||| |
______National City Bank N. Y. |
| | |
| National Bank of Commerce N.Y ---|
| | \
| Hanover National Bank N.Y. \
| | \
| Chase National Bank N.Y. \
| |
| |
Shareholders - National City Bank - N.Y. |
----------------------------------------- |
| /
James Stillman /
Elsie m. William Rockefeller /
Isabel m. Percy Rockefeller /
William Rockefeller Shareholders - National Bank of Commerce N. Y.
J. P. Morgan -----------------------------------------------
M.T. Pyne Equitable Life - J.P. Morgan
Percy Pyne Mutual Life - J.P. Morgan
J.W. Sterling H.P. Davison - J. P. Morgan
NY Trust/NY Edison Mary W. Harriman
Shearman & Sterling A.D. Jiullard - North British Merc. Insurance
| Jacob Schiff
| Thomas F. Ryan
| Paul Warburg
| Levi P. Morton - Guaranty Trust - J. P. Morgan
|
|
Shareholders - First National Bank of N.Y.
-------------------------------------------
J.P. Morgan
George F. Baker
George F. Baker Jr.
Edith Brevoort Baker
US Congress - 1946-64
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders - Hanover National Bank N.Y.
------------------------------------------
James Stillman
William Rockefeller
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders - Chase National Bank N.Y.
---------------------------------------
George F. Baker
http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html
This is now much worse, and about the last intervention of Mcafee's video, this is how Pegasus software works.
They don't need to implant any xip, the mobile device is the biggest mass surveillance device that exists, and we carry it voluntarily.
Our behaviors are predictable thanks to it, and if you have a predictable behavior you are easy to govern, that's why we live under more and more draconian conditions and do nothing.
By being able to predict the behavior of people en masse, they can apply the theory of the frog in the boiling pot, that is, apply the changes gradually so that we do not rebel.
https://m.primal.net/KxoZ.mp4
Advice if you collaborate in bitcoin privacy projects.
Always use anonymous development accounts (Github, Gitlab...), don't keep permanent profiles, use them a few times and never use them again.
Create the profiles behind tor or vpn, obviously don't use your email account.
If you need your project to have reputation keep the founding account until your project gets traction, then disappear and come back with another account (after giving up the maintenance).
You'll have to leave your ego behind, but it's better that than ending up in jail.
Invincible Privacy Group
IPG is a group of bitcoiners which is focused on funding bitcoin developers improving privacy. Donors can either donate directly to the recommended projects or contribute in the pool which is used to help developers regularly.
https://invincible-privacy.github.io/donate/
This is the greatest scientific achievement of the last 100 years, joining the cap to the bottle.
No seriously, you sons of bitches are going to pay for it.
https://m.primal.net/Kwpx.png
Following @stacksatsio's post I want to raise the question of whether man went to the moon.
Despite being a conspiracy theorist, or so I am told, I believe that man did go to the moon for several reasons.
- Images of the lunar landing sites (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter). These images are from 2009, although we can argue that they were taken by the US and could be false.
- The Chinese Chang'e 2 probe managed to capture images of the Apollo landing sites in 2012. Although not at the same resolution as NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) images, these photos also showed the location of lunar modules and equipment left on the surface.
- Retroreflectors on the Moon. During the Apollo 11, 14 and 15 missions, astronauts left retroreflectors on the lunar surface. These devices allow pulses of laser light to be sent from the Earth to the Moon, and the retroreflector returns the light, allowing the distance between the Earth and the Moon to be measured with great precision. Some observatories and universities have conducted experiments using these retroreflectors, and the results are publicly available.
- Moon rock samples. The Apollo missions brought back 382 kilograms of lunar rocks, which have been analyzed in laboratories around the world, including institutions outside the U.S. These samples have been studied by independent scientists and have unique characteristics that differentiate them from terrestrial and meteorite rocks.
- International verification. It is not only the U.S. that has monitored these missions. Other countries, including the Soviet Union, which was competing in the space race, and nations with advanced tracking capabilities, verified and acknowledged the landings. For example, the Soviet Union did not refute the Apollo missions despite being in the midst of the Cold War.
What do you think?
Please don't use against me the appeal that you are a Nazi because I don't think the same as you, because I am indeed a Nazi.
I hope you understand that it has no effect on me, and that I am proud to be what you say I am.
https://m.primal.net/Kwha.png
I neither know nazis nor hamas nor hezbollah, but if you claim I belong to them I am very proud to be an extremist Islamist.
I hope you understand my point 😂.
It is doubtful that a person who does not have children can look beyond his or her own self-interest.
Only those with offspring can look beyond their own death.
Saying that any opinion you don't like is Nazi is the same thing that fascists/communists do, especially the current ones (Wokes).
Don't use that resource, it's an advice, it's a way to discredit the opposite without any kind of argumentation and denotes a lack of honesty in the speech.
Lastly, I don't think anyone got the point of my post, Saylor has no children.
Until this year in my fucking life I had never heard the name Taylor Swift, she seems to be the star promoted by the statists. I haven't seen anything more crappy and horrifying than that shit and her followers, if they had a nuclear weapons button I would throw it.
@DarthCoin surely has his entire discography
https://m.primal.net/KwVg.mp4
"Scandal in Germany. A public television program (ARD) hires an actor to pose as a normal citizen and warns of the dangers of AfD, “a wolf in sheep's clothing”."
This happens in all countries, 100% of what is on television is either a lie or extremely manipulated. Television is the instrument of indoctrination of the state and the powerful.
If you want your life to go well, follow Cyph3rp9nk's three rules.
- Do the opposite of what TV tells you.
- Do the opposite of what the bank tells you.
- Do the opposite of what your neighbor does.
https://m.primal.net/KwVD.mp4
SEC has just granted accelerated approval for the listing and trading of options on $IBIT.
And you think they are not controlling bitcoin?
- First they created cash-settled futures (Fiat), which made it possible to create paper bitcoin.
- When they already had a huge futures market with the CME, then they gave way to ETFs to be able to control the price, ETFs are also cash settled (Fiat).
- Finally they have approved options, also not redeemed with the underlying, redeemed with Fiat.
You must understand that the three Bitcoin institutional instruments, Futures, ETFs and options all revolve around Fiat and not Bitcoin, they are all cash settled. The only one that affects Bitcoin volume are the ETFs and even then they are not redeemed on the underlying.
They are trying the same play as with gold.
The money changers, i.e. the old bankers (Rothschilds) knew that to get into power they simply had to have as much gold as possible and create the loan/interest system.
This is what they are doing now with Bitcon, taking Bitcon away from the people.
Saifedean explains very well in his book Patron Fiat that in a Bitcoin system it won't make much sense to lend Bitcoin for interest.
What can you do?
- Never deposit Bitcoin in a bank.
- Create circular economies, black market, grey market, counter economy.
- Never pay taxes on Bitcoin.
- Never give Bitcoin to a government, before they are lost.
https://m.primal.net/KwUo.pnghttps://www.sec.gov/files/rules/sro/ise/2024/34-101128.pdf
Michael Saylor is not a bitcoiner, he is an agent Smith, if he were a Bitcoiner he would not say this nonsense.
"If i put a $100 billion into bitcoin and get 0% yield that's just as bad as $100 billion in US bonds and pay 0% yield, in both cases they're non-performing assets". -
@saylor
Agorism is Not Anarcho-Capitalism
"The goal of this essay is three-fold. First, I will identify the key concepts which outline the philosophy of Agorism and the strategy of Counter-Economics, as outlined by Samuel E. Konkin III in The New Libertarian Manifesto and An Agorist Primer. Second, I will illustrate how radicals of all stripes can utilize the strategy of counter-economics, as described by Konkin, without necessarily endorsing his philosophy of Agorism and it’s specific tenets. Finally, I will describe what sets Agorism apart from Anarcho-Capitalism and other schools of thought. I will show that although the Counter-Economic strategy can be utilized by nearly any individual, Agorism itself is not simply a strain or subset of Anarcho-Capitalism, but a unique political philosophy of its own."
https://c4ss.org/content/46153
The Agorist Archives, announced on February 23, 2021, is an ongoing effort by KoPubCo to digitize, curate, and preserve the articles, papers, notes, letters, calendars, and recorded speeches of the originator of Counter-Economics and Agorism: Samuel Edward Konkin III (7/8/1947 – 2/23/2004).
https://archives.kopubco.com
The global money supply m2 is unstoppable.
I feel sorry for all those who do not know how to protect themselves against the inflation scam.
https://m.primal.net/KvcP.png
I recently gave Mullvad Browser a try but it still doesn't convince me for my daily browser.
For those who don't know, Mullvad Browser is made in collaboration with the creators of Tor browser and Mullvad VPN.
And also collaborates the creator arkenfox (user.js) which is applied in LibreWolf (Thorin-Oakenpants).
Basically the Mullvad browser is the same as Tor, but without Tor, with all the advantages and disadvantages that this entails.
The main difference between Mullvad and LibreWolf is that Mullvad, like Tor starts in private browsing mode and LibreWolf does not, this has implications in daily use as described below.
The disadvantages I see with respect to LibreWolf:
- It does not support Firefox Containers
- Not being able to share session between tabs.
- You can't add exceptions for cookie clearing on closing
- No flatpak version.
The advantages:
- Better update system
- Financial and Tor team support (The browser is based on the Tor browser code)
So I'm sticking with LibreWolf for now.
The first thing is to ask yourself:
- Why do you want a VPN?
- What do you expect from a VPN?
Personally I don't like them, they don't protect you from anything, they simply serve for example to evade the denouncements of certain governments for p2p downloads or to be able to visit websites that are blocked in your country, they are not useful for offering privacy.
Any “legal” company is bound by the laws of the Fiat system, it cannot protect you.
If you want privacy Tor or i2p.
No es más fascista aquel que viste un uniforme militar si no aquel quien intenta borrar la historia.
La izquierda española ha hecho un trabajo excelente manipulando la historia y ocultando sus crímenes durante el Franquismo y sobre todo su historia previa al Franquismo.
La izquierda española nunca ha sido demócrata, solo buscaban ser una república satélite de la union soviética.
Nunca defenderé una dictadura, pero tampoco voy a defender la mentira, ni tampoco la democracia, solo defiendo la libertad y la verdad.
https://m.primal.net/KvYc.mp4
La democracia siempre es la dictadura de la mayoría, nunca me ha parecido un sistema justo. Para ser “más” justo desde mi punto de vista, tendría que atomizarse. Es decir, volver a un modelo de ciudades estado como en el renacimiento. La explicación es muy lógica, si aplicas una democracia a un territorio muy vasto, obligas a quien no esté de acuerdo con el sistema a desplazarse fuera de él recorriendo largas distancias geográficas con todo lo que ello implica (trabajo, hogar, familia…). En cambio si volvemos a las ciudades estado cada una con su legislación y “democracia”, el cambio de sistema se hace mucho más fácil, solo tienes que cambiar de ciudad si no estás de acuerdo con sus condiciones. Sería el libre mercado de la “democracia”.
Movilizarse no tiene porque se antilibertario, en un sistema anarcocapitalista, el único contrapoder del gran capital serían los sindicatos horizontales y ello requiere algo de organización, pero desde mi punto de vista el interés siempre tiene que nacer del interés individual y no del colectivo, porque el interés individual no se corrompe (a no ser que te corrompas a ti mismo, que falles a tus principios) y el interés colectivo sí.
Por otro lado, no creo que el independentismo catalán fuera mejor que lo que tenéis actualmente dado que son políticos del mismo cariz. Simplemente cambiarías de amos, son todos ladrones.
La única opción para mi (es una utopía actualmente), es liberalizar la democracia a través de las ciudades estado, ello crearía competencia entre las distintas ciudades para ofrecer mejores servicios y también crearía competencia entre los diferentes sistemas tributarios.
Los nacionalismos políticos juegan con el sentimentalismo de la patria, pero confunden deliberadamente patria con estado, patria es tu familia, tus amigos, la tierra que pisas, tu lengua, la patria no tiene bandera y menos dueño.
Many are unaware of the history of the Rotchschild family behind the central banking conglomerate and the BIS.
I recommend this documentary as a historical index and from here you can go pulling the thread.
https://youtu.be/AOk3wBuQNcE
They have lowered interest rates by 50 points, now the Rothschild family's employee Jerome Powell will come out to tell his sorrows and life goes on, Bitcoin will go up and down in the short term, come on, see you again.
nostr:note1msu55lc2glgl3srjclj7c3pxcr8xr0df4a2ut7qscpv3ecr05zkqcdcqf6
Interest rates are no longer the key, the key is liquidity, bitcoin has risen in a high interest rate environment because liquidity was injected through the BTFP bailout program.
Today's is just a pantomime.
They have lowered interest rates by 50 points, now the Rothschild family's employee Jerome Powell will come out to tell his sorrows and life goes on, Bitcoin will go up and down in the short term, come on, see you again.
nostr:note1msu55lc2glgl3srjclj7c3pxcr8xr0df4a2ut7qscpv3ecr05zkqcdcqf6
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by Cyph3rp9nk | export
Chart of who "owns" the Federal Reserve Published 1976 Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control. N.M. Rothschild , London - Bank of England ______________________________________ | | | J. Henry Schroder | Banking | Corp. | | Brown, Shipley - Morgan Grenfell - Lazard - | & Company & Company Brothers | | | | | --------------------| -------| | | | | | | | | Alex Brown - Brown Bros. - Lord Mantagu - Morgan et Cie -- Lazard ---| & Son | Harriman Norman | Paris Bros | | | / | N.Y. | | | | | | | | Governor, Bank | J.P. Morgan Co -- Lazard ---| | of England / N.Y. Morgan Freres | | 1924-1938 / Guaranty Co. Paris | | / Morgan Stanley Co. | / | / | \Schroder Bank | / | Hamburg/Berlin | / Drexel & Company / | / Philadelphia / | / / | / Lord Airlie | / / | / M. M. Warburg Chmn J. Henry Schroder | | Hamburg --------- marr. Virginia F. Ryan | | | grand-daughter of Otto | | | Kahn of Kuhn Loeb Co. | | | | | | Lehman Brothers N.Y -------------- Kuhn Loeb Co. N. Y. | | -------------------------- µ | | | | 8 | | | | Lehman Brothers - Mont. Alabama Solomon Loeb Abraham Kuhn | | __|______________________|_________ Lehman-Stern, New Orleans Jacob Schiff/Theresa Loeb Nina Loeb/Paul Warburg ------------------------- | | | | | Mortimer Schiff James Paul Warburg _____________|_______________/ | | | | | | Mayer Lehman | Emmanuel Lehman \ | | | \ Herbert Lehman Irving Lehman \ | | | \ Arthur Lehman \ Phillip Lehman John Schiff/Edith Brevoort Baker / | Present Chairman Lehman Bros / Robert Owen Lehman Kuhn Loeb - Granddaughter of / | George F. Baker | / | | / | | / Lehman Bros Kuhn Loeb (1980) | / | | / Thomas Fortune Ryan | | | | | | Federal Reserve Bank Of New York | |||||||| | ______National City Bank N. Y. | | | | | National Bank of Commerce N.Y ---| | | \ | Hanover National Bank N.Y. \ | | \ | Chase National Bank N.Y. \ | | | | Shareholders - National City Bank - N.Y. | ----------------------------------------- | | / James Stillman / Elsie m. William Rockefeller / Isabel m. Percy Rockefeller / William Rockefeller Shareholders - National Bank of Commerce N. Y. J. P. Morgan ----------------------------------------------- M.T. Pyne Equitable Life - J.P. Morgan Percy Pyne Mutual Life - J.P. Morgan J.W. Sterling H.P. Davison - J. P. Morgan NY Trust/NY Edison Mary W. Harriman Shearman & Sterling A.D. Jiullard - North British Merc. Insurance | Jacob Schiff | Thomas F. Ryan | Paul Warburg | Levi P. Morton - Guaranty Trust - J. P. Morgan | | Shareholders - First National Bank of N.Y. ------------------------------------------- J.P. Morgan George F. Baker George F. Baker Jr. Edith Brevoort Baker US Congress - 1946-64 | | | | | Shareholders - Hanover National Bank N.Y. ------------------------------------------ James Stillman William Rockefeller | | | | | Shareholders - Chase National Bank N.Y. --------------------------------------- George F. Baker http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html