Why is this elitist?
Why do you think bitcoin Onchain transactions should be cheap? Onchain deliberately has very limited trans per sec.  

 I don't see the logic of me rejoicing high fees so people work on scaling being elitist 🤷🏼
You want a bitcoin the whole world can access, but you don't want high onchain fees?  

 I'm not saying it's a rich man's game.  

 Join us!
https://t.me/makerbits
https://t.me/lnbits 

 
Nos-da was the pronunciation decided on the first video every made about Nostr. If you pronounce it any other way you will have your account on nostr suspended. 

Nos-da is also Welsh for goodnight 😴

nostr:nevent1qqstg3yjcq62snppsrpzz949h2533dpjfg30stgq0m4vz002stww5hcpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsygrgzy027kxldu92g8lr6hhllaked24etaerzy8psqxfg29gtevymupsgqqqqqqs8thmvd 

 nostr:nevent1qqsg8t5zv4nw3ewa7cap2efm43qrq7wrnnfuq4rfeg087d66ffhsykcpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcpzps0uwaclt7jp3lf6cjfzrgv0rx6zejm6vc763uzvh0mvpryq6g93qvzqqqqqqyusu2ca 

 Making a tutorial video today/tomorrow. Was just slammed on other stuff 

 Because he is a normal human being, not some whacko paranoid bitcoiner like us 😂 

 
Having a centralised service in a business stack is a sword of Damocles. 
With nostr, those random centralised rule changes that destroy good ideas/projects/businesses, no longer exists.
nostr:nevent1qqsgg9puq7j9267wan892vmv2lw3h0r6nk8cudyetznc2006wcq46kqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzqjj720lnk7x4hkug5k6755tgrk67eu6657kkls4lrgsa3ewfvwgmqvzqqqqqqyky42z2 

 This issue you have is with the njump project,. Any tracking they use is restricted to `/<event>` on nostr dot com. 
Lame move hijacking this thread to push a bunch of FUD.  

 Check dms 🙏 

 It's not lack of understanding what's needed for nostr dot com, it's time/resources. We'll get to it. Dedicating more resources to an overhaul and making the site more useful is why I put it under the official management of LNbits Inc. Once LNbits Inc's seed raise is complete, its a priority. 

 You talking about njump?
Hardly spyware, and only if you use /<event> param 

 He's talking about njump located on only `/<event>` I think, which has some tracking (not by us, but the njump project). If he hates njump so much he should fork, and create a version without tracking we can use🙏 

 It's just a censorship p2p marketplace client. YOU decide on the merchants you expose yourself to. We will maintain a list of merchants for convenience but only for vanilla clearnet stuff.  

 😂 

 Tivoli is sick.
Walt Disney went there as he wanted Disneyland to have same vibe (failed horribly obv).
❤️ Copenhagen. What other city has an amusement park (Tivoli), and anarchist Freetown (Christiania), within it 😍 

 No, but it will soon 👍 

 Yeah that's all stuff we have talked about, using Nostr for mesh. Happy to come on show 

 Local, I imagined controllers connected over wifi or ble. Espmdf does this and it's sick. Controllers can be both clients and relays, and map the network using gossip.  

 Run the client yourself locally, wherever https://github.com/lnbits/nostr-market-app 

 Also please tell me you don't take my self-proclaimed title seriously 😂
If so, it was a bad attempt at irony on my part 

 No idea, we will sell gizmos on it

https://market.nostr.com/?merchant=a7e8069e57ec8ff359d994621e8a492930f1a2ea3f862629e54e2ed627d182e8#/ 

 No, the client is just empty template that fills. My marketplace client will be full of vanilla stuff, on someone elses browser something else, all depends on the merchants keys they pull in 

 Sure! 
https://github.com/lnbits/nostr-market-app

https://github.com/lnbits/nostrmarket 

 The pr https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/814 

 See, you get it! If nostr were made for just iot it would be justified. We are working on demo 👍  

 Bah, what do you mean?  

 That exists for visa tap/pay 

 Eventually, it solves that problem  

 Man, so used to splitting up "nostr" on twitter posts so it doesn't shadow ban, I did it on nostr!  

 Yep. Great idea 

 At least that won't happen to nostr.com 🔥 

 That's how we got to the topic, I was explaining where some of toxicity came from.  

 As immunity to forces that tried to coopt the protocol  

 It's who buys it, rather than people wiling to buy 

 Yeah, pretty much 

 That was already chosen, did you not get the memo? 
https://youtu.be/SkkIwO_X4i4 

 Wherever you draw that line, proliferation of gun ownership makes the line more extreme. Here in UK a cricket bat will do, as the ruffians won't have guns. If they did have guns I'd want a machine gun, if they had machine guns I'd want (whatever comes next, chlorine gas?), etc, etc, etc 

 Yes you do! More merchants joining in. Vlad started this for nip15  https://t.me/+OhfuguRtXQkwZGY8 

 Yep, agreed 

 I even wrote a couple of those nips you're using 

 I even wrote a couple of those nips you're using 

 Dude, don't use with real funds though!
Very old project. Use this, it's the most recent https://github.com/lnbits/hardware-wallet 

 Opposite. Not enough people care about decentralising mining. The very fact taproot could get in off a few closed door agreements with miners IS an issue. 

 Anarchism was historically left, majority of anarchist sentiment is still left https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism 

 Nothing wrong in a dude selling a domain. Could be for the best. Ie we all wish Rogar Ver sold bitcoin dot com to someone better in 2013,. I'm Roger Ver (potentially)  

 Low time preference debugging, like rendering av in the 2000s. Change a thing, wait 3 days, change another thing, wait 3 days... 

 If I am in fact a dick then surely the domain would be better managed by someone else? Roger Ver didn't sell his domain and he is a monster dick. Would it of been a dick move if he had sold to something better? 
It's about seeing if a person/company/project exists out there who are appropriate to pass onto. Likelihood is that there is not, so LNbits will officially manage after 20th, so I'm less of an attack vector. Either way, whatever comes next for the domain is better.