If the voices sound like Saylor just ignore them, he just wants you to buy some ETF. Jokes aside, I also heard whispers or people shouting when I was younger, nowadays that happens bery rarely and does not last longer than a 2-3 minutes. Also always before falling a sleep. I think something just triggers my subconscious childhood dramas 🤷🏻♂️
Convincing people to use bitcoin is getting easier every year! When people are already used to next day payments from banks they will not be happy about this change. Habit is a bitch.
Rewrite:
I'm a web dev, I have a daily job but all the clients I find or that find me to work for on the side, I encourage them to pay me in btc and give them a 10% discount on my regular price and tell them that I only accept fiat in rare cases. But usually the easiest way is to help them to on-board on the strike app and let them send me the money from the fiat balance, no need to touch btc if they don't want.
As a web developer with a daily job, I also take on side projects with clients I find or who find me. I offer these clients a 10% discount on my regular price if they agree to pay me in Bitcoin. I inform them that I only accept fiat currency in exceptional cases. For clients who are new to cryptocurrency, I often assist them in setting up the Strike app, which allows them to send me payments from their fiat balance without needing to directly interact with BTC if they prefer not to.
Let’s break this down in simpler terms:
Bitcoin is evolving, and that change means users will increasingly have to pay for transactions, which isn’t always good news. But we need to face this reality to find solutions.
There are three types of Bitcoin users:
1. Group A: People who can afford any transaction fees without worry.
2. Group B: People who can afford fees but need to be careful with how often they transact.
3. Group C: People who can’t afford to make transactions at all.
In the early days, everyone was in Group A, but now most people are in Group B. The goal is to keep Group B as large as possible. We can do this by:
1. Making the Lightning Network (a way to speed up Bitcoin transactions) more reliable so people don’t need to make on-chain transactions often.
2. Making Bitcoin transactions more efficient so they cost less.
However, even with these improvements, some people (Group C) still won’t be able to afford to make transactions. We don’t have a perfect solution for them yet, but some ideas have been tried:
1. Wait for lower fees: Some hope that if these people wait long enough, fees will drop, but that’s unlikely because many people will be trying to do the same thing.
2. Cover fees for others: Another idea is that a service could cover the fees for people who can’t afford them, but this doesn’t work well because it’s not practical or sustainable.
The remaining options are:
1. Group transactions together: This means combining transactions from multiple people to share the costs, but it requires cooperation and trust within a group.
2. Incentivize honesty: Create systems where a coordinator holds funds for many people, with built-in safeguards to prevent dishonesty. This is complicated and needs more research to make it work reliably.
In summary, dealing with sub-fee amounts in Bitcoin involves trade-offs and challenges, particularly around trust and financial incentives. It’s a complex problem that needs more research and creative solutions, but improving Bitcoin’s capabilities is a key part of the solution.
Notes by CuriousJoe | export