I think editing a note is the equivalent of a photograph with filters. It simply does not represent what we are in the non-virtual world. If I understand the objective of all this correctly, do we not seek to be as authentic as possible? If we offend or make a mistake in the non-virtual world, we must take responsibility through dialogue, an apology, a footnote, etc. What is not representative is the permanence of our mistakes because if this is like speaking outside of the protocol, the mistakes are forgotten (not how we make others feel, of course). Perhaps the core of the discussion is that: the possibility that an error disappears over time. Ultimately, I believe, no one remains static in their thinking. We evolve, we grow, even our last breath. So expiring notes? 😉
Some of the dialogues are ridiculous and it takes some liberties with historical events. However, I think Ridley Scott does not disappoint in what is his trademark: grandiosity.
Ahh… I hated the character assigned to Pedro Pascal (a waste of talent).
It's good to know that Pedro Pascal did this. It's one of the reasons why he is so appreciated. He is not afraid to stand up to injustice.
Thanks for sharing! 🙏
“But recruiting AI experts for that expansion may be challenging for ByteDance, which saw an "exodus" of top AI experts in May, as startups lure talent to attract investors seeking to prop up the next OpenAI, the South China Morning Post reported. ByteDance also competes for talent with top rivals Tencent and Alibaba, which have also been investing heavily in AI.”
Compared to Bitcoin mining, it's a disgrace. On the other hand, it's to be expected that AI will receive so much attention and resources because it is potentially very useful to sustain the current model and, for extension, narratives.
What caught my attention in the article is what I highlighted because I thought the Chinese had no shortage of talent.
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by Connie | export