HI've noticed on Threads, Bluesky, and even some apps here on Nostr that I’m shown a lot more content from people I’m not following. This is often due to reposts, quote posts, or just the algorithms at work. While this content can be engaging and spark conversations, it’s often not healthy. I see people posting obviously or maybe obliviously wrong things, which then get corrected and boosted, creating a vicious cycle. For example, someone mentioned considering a hyphenated name for their kids. I shared how my hyphenated name caused issues with computers, especially with international travel. This led to many calling me a bigot because the original poster was a queer woman. It’s odd because I’m queer myself, but it seems they felt an amab queer shouldn’t share personal experiences directly related to the topic. I also saw clickbait articles about triathletes vomiting at the end of an Olympic triathlon, blaming it on a polluted river. Yes, the river is polluted, but triathletes often throw up at the end of races, and the swim was two hours before the nausea hit. These issues occurred on Twitter too, but I didn’t experience it the same way there. I used Twitter daily from the moment Jack invited me and our coworkers onto the service, and for me, the conversations were healthier. I understand that many others had negative experiences, though. On Nostr, I see zaps often rewarding hot takes and posts that signal membership in one group or another. This seems to exacerbate the issue, as people are incentivized to make posts that cater to specific in-groups rather than fostering genuine dialogue. My worry is that maybe we’re actually doing worse with the new platforms. Is this something other people are seeing? How do we navigate this and foster healthier online conversations?
I still pop into Twitter for a little while every day and it’s way worse over there, but the community notes do help correct misinformation. My interactions on Nostr are awesome for the most part. I do mute kind of aggressively here, but I delete my mute list and start over from time to time.
Eliminate re-posts
I will stop using whatever client does that
I have to say, it's nice to use coracle when there's something going on that leads to a lot of reposts. Not like on one note, I think that's funny. But like a newsworthy event that everyone is posting all sorts of stuff about & reposting eachother so there's a lot of repetition & lost signal. On a normal day though, I like to see what my follows are sharing.
I forgot Coracle doesn’t have reposts. Hahaha maybe I wouldn’t stop using a client that eliminates reposts then. I still use Coracle sometimes. Definitely far from being my main driver though. I mostly switch between Damus and Primal all day.
I think reposts have a place.. but their intergration into the regular content is an opportunity. Whether they are seperate feed, a delay i rendering. Not sure. But often i feel they more noise than signal. But not always.
Reposts are important for reasons I don’t feel I should have to explain.
😅👌
I think Primal collapses multiple reposts into one. Not sure how they do it, but I just saw one that said reposted by someone and 2 others. For some reason I don’t get bothered by the noise from heavily reposted things in Damus though. I just scroll past without thinking about it. 😂
That would completely cripple discovery. It's enough to aggregate them.
Low signal: re-posts, reactions Possibility of higher signal: zaps, quotes, comments - things that cost some energy
Zaps are mostly replicating the same social media and parasocial dynamics of legacy social media (lol)
Those turn out to be inherent to humans and not merely an effect of algos. The people you know, know more people than you do.
Yeah, mostly I'm just pushing against the idea that zaps are some sort of good 'signal' of something
at the end of the day you need to give individuals ability to control their feed and make the experience fun for every involved. positive over negative interactions. with the way it is now it only takes one determined jerk to ruin many conversations. community is the answer in my mind - alogirthmically tie everyone to at least 10 people they have positive reactions with would be a good start. looking forward to seeing you at #nostriga to talk more on this
You have articulated this very well and I don't have solutions for this. But I am sorry that you are constantly attacked. I have seen these attacks for a long time and I've even told people off as it truly upsets me. You deserve to live the life that makes you happy, to love whomever you want to. At the end of the day, being in love with someone who is in love with you is a beautiful thing ❤️
I agree with you, I am seeing more meme hot takes and polarizing content within my feeds as time carries. I joined NOSTR hoping for less of that but I would imagine as users pour in value might be harder to find, depending on what the user considers valuable. Some ppl just post trash 🚮 chasing the attention bug. Value is different for everyone. Within NOSTR I do see a community of thoughtful, well-researched posts and constructive interactions. But it’s a different niche at the moment due to its current adoption and developmental stage. On the flip side, those in the know of NOSTR do seem to be cliquish. They only engage / zap one another back and forth rather than contributing value around other topics of discussion. When zaps are measured as a present filter the “rich” can buy the market. I love ❤️ NOSTR because it offers the users full ownership and interoperability which other social networks don’t. Figuring out the rest will take time. Maybe it’s the clients that support NOSTR that will need to help drive the change?
It does seem to happen. And unfortunately my solution make me less open. Because I don't want to spend time with negativity I immediately block people who say things like that. I just remove them from my digital world (unless they are someone I've know and respected for a while even if I disagree. in Thai case I spend time trying to see why they posted something bloke that). This is good for my mental health, blood pressure and time management but it unfortunately limits points of view I see. But I see it as a risk worth taking as I just don't have the bandwidth to deal with the volume of negative posts and people.
I agree that it comes down to incentives, as you point out. Whether it’s a misinterpretation (intentional or not), or an entitled/inflated pancakes v. waffles outrage, or an a attempt at a witty dunk on a perceived enemy to score points, or a pandering to one’s follower set to maintain loyalty, or imposing/expressing an authoritative opinion outside of one’s expertise to increase an audience or relevance… All of these are driven by an incentive to be seen, feel validated, or get paid. I think it comes down to culture. Note, for example, how Tumblr used to have a unique audience and content creation. It was different than MySpace or Facebook. Some of that had to do with how these platforms were built and how user interactions were displayed. Some of it was how the content, itself, was consumed by users. Note that many areas of Reddit (at the time of writing) still have a playful sense of humor, and supportive community, while X is broadly a cesspool of insults and hatred. Why? Is it just because the Mods make it so? Is it the ability to downvote? Seems like there’s an opportunity for a Reddit-like Nostr alternative. Mods wouldn’t be able to remove content from relays of course, but it would be nice to have a community that wasn’t permissioned and publicly traded, with all the incentives that come with *that*. TL;DR build better communities by supporting others with thoughtful interactions and disincentivize trolls (somehow).
Lemmy and Kbin are good decentralised Reddit alternatives
Zaps can be as much a signal as they can be noise. There’s not much we can do to control the conversation aside from honesty and integrity. Especially on open platforms. The truth will speak for itself. Zaps won’t censor you. In an open medium where anyone can say anything, you can definitely expect adversity and people falling into the opposite opinion of yours. This isn’t something to shy away from. It should rather be encouraged. I don’t look at the amount of zaps a note receives to deem its worth. That’s just me. I don’t care who it is. If they say something I like I’ll zap it and back it up. If they say something I don’t, I’ll ignore or call it out depending on whether it’s a subject that is a priority for me. If it’s something I don’t have an opinion on I’ll either dive deeper or move on with my life. Open mediums mean we as individuals need to make decisions on what is worth our time, and worth fighting about.
My frustration with zaps is that we’re not using them enough to support more substantive content like @isolabell.art 🎨’s art vs her takes on nostr or btc. Or @Global Sports Central’s coverage vs opinion.
Actually a he and yes he’s a wonderful artist 💜
Oh @isolabell.art 🎨 is a he. Apologies I made assumptions and didn’t know. Oops.
I actually thought the same last year, I was embarrassed and apologetic 💜🫂
It's a mistake that many people make, no problem 🫂🎨
Are zaps supported by Nos Social?
do you think it's the lack of network strength? we either need more people to send smaller zaps, or people sending larger zaps.
How much are people zapping on the other platforms? Your frustration has nothing to do with zaps. It's just a tech for transmitting value. You seem to actually be frustrated with what people are valuing most, and that just doesn't make sense. Did you think that everyone would zap what you value? There is no 'we.' It's actually a feature that an artist can get on a platform and get zapped for notes, whether they're art or not. It's okay that some of their following values some notes more than art. Income is income. Value is value.
And that’s a fair point. I’m arguing that your frustration is where your control stops, and that’s how it should be. The fact you vocalized (on a permission-less protocol) your disappointment with how zaps are used should be sufficient ammo for some users’ behaviour to change. There is no way to enforce a behaviour change on everyone with Nostr. People agreeing with you will change, but it doesn’t mean the majority will right away. In an environment like this where nothing can be restricted, truth and integrity should thrive, not because the majority dictate what truth is, but because truth can’t be stopped. Sooner or later people navigate away from chaos, because truth and facts are a simpler way of living. It’s not a chicken and egg problem. It’s a cart before the horse situation. “Build it and they will come”. Post your truth, zap what you deem worthy, and sooner or later people will be doing the same. I didn’t know of the 2 npubs you mentioned so I never zapped them, but I also never zapped silly memes or shitposts. Even though they’re funny they don’t provide me value. I do however rely on Nostr to find hidden gems of privacy best practices, Bitcoin setups, new software versions of freedom tech that can actually make a difference. I also zap people I actually interact with to solve a current problem I have with my setups. Nostr is a tool. Zaps are a tool. There are right ways to use themand wrong ways. I can only teach someone how to use thrm in a right way, but I can’t enforce their behaviour.
If you look at the data from nostr.band leas than 2000 people per day send zaps to ~800 people per day. The message of V4V doesn’t add up when you look at the data for zaps. I don’t think its the fault of zaps per. They have been implemented in a way that mimics likes and feeds into our dopamine receptors. In addition much of Nostr resembles the UI for algorithmic driven feeds. If zaps are going to support creative work on Nostr both the work and the zaps likely need to be represented differently in the UI.
@nos.social friends @rabble and @Linda join us Monday night (tomorrow) @7PM CST on @tunestr or @fountain_app on web radio so you can see how we are trying to change the message of #boosts and #zaps it’s not just about the social implementation but wider adoption across new tools like @fountain_app that is bridging the mobile app experience with the nostr social graph ⚡️⚡️
Those stats seem pretty good considering 10k - 15k DAUs
Oh is the 35k WAU? That’s the number I thought Nostr had for DAU.
Just checked the stats. Currently around 15k DAUs and 40k WAUs. I think many people use multiple accounts so it’s probably less than that. I posted notes with 4 different accounts today. And I post from at least 3 accounts every day.
Are you open to sharing why you post from multiple accounts? I’m curious in general but specifically if it has anything to do with curating content or interacting with particular communities?
I try to help with user and content discovery with @FatZaps and @WavlakeTrendingBot. I have a couple other accounts I use to make memes. I write stupid notes with them and then make quotes using https://quotestr.vercel.app. Also, I have accounts for testing when developing stuff so I don’t spam my followers.
Same. I control 4 active accounts, but only zap from this one.
I wonder how common this is. If everyone is doing this, that means there are actually only around 4k DAUs with almost 50% of them sending zaps every day 😂
Based on other posts of yours you are actively creating communities on Nostr. What is motivating you to have separate accounts in addition to the communities?
This is super helpful. Test accounts make sense. For the others, what is motivating you to create a separate account for each activity? Why for example wouldn’t you use this one to promote Wavlake music?
I already promote Wavlake heavily on this account. I also already post a million notes a day on this account. Those other accounts are bots with content that are produced by scripts I wrote. I manually filter the content that is posted though.
some people make tons of accounts to try and collect small amounts of sats from everyone. not sure if you were around for the LightX era. 😂 nostr:note12wjr0y4a9gs8f5kxxh0zmrf0nc7f305xfkm7t5mtnl0hkqcp5w2qtsn8xu
What do you propose? Is there something wrong with the UI “resembling” algorithmic feeds in your thinking? I ask because it seems coincidental just because algorithms were used on the common UI, possibly rather than the other way around. Is there an example you can think of for how to alter or better align the design? 🤔
Maybe it's time for to completely drop the "like" button
It’s an option in Damus. OnlyZaps.
I would like to see this in Primal where you can zap a post.
Interesting thoughts in this thread but imo it includes some critical misunderstandings. 1) nostr is a protocol, not a platform. This is important as it changes how UX(D) works. It changes how social-behavioral patterns emerge, because it’s different things to different people. It looks and works differently based on what client you use. 2) V4V doesn’t propose an artist can live off art posted on something which is in its early beginnings with 40k active weekly users. Especially arts, music etc. follow a power law. As a result network effects need to be much much bigger for this to work. The general assumption of V4V holds true though. Users not only zap contents they like but they zap people too. Albeit for different reasons, sometimes just to zap for the zaps sake. 3) it’s not that traditional social media platforms design UX to trigger stronger dopaminergic reactions. It’s more like people do it themselves, platforms recognize the patterns and build on top of that them to capitalize on it. They artificially enhance a natural bad pattern so to say. Nostr will be a dopaminergic experience or it will die out due to utter boredom. The challenge is not to suppress this but to make it meaningful and balanced.
I agree that we need to talk about the clients and not reference the protocol. 2) I’m curious how you define V4V? When we talked to Nostr users in January the thing they all agreed on was the need for more diverse content. What is the incentive for Creators and Journalists to come to Nostr if they can’t get paid for their work? Maybe not fully make a living but at least cover equipment costs. 3) At this point I think the ux is fully optimized for engagement and dopamine hits. Even in the programs Nos is running we are finding that a subset of people feel the need to make Bitcoin or Nostr related content so they fit in. This is instead of the content they applied to the program with. I would argue that by implementing the corporate social ux patterns the clients on Nostr are reinforcing the dopamine effect. At the same time we need to enhance discovery of other types of content - especially for those who are excited about the tech but aren’t interested in building it. To this end Nos launched a replacement for reply counts on the main feed last week. In part bc it’s too process intense to do the counts while generating the feed. It’s the first of many experiments to move away from infinite scroll and update the experience of viewing content on Nostr.
I find myself writing more about Nostr and Bitcoin than I naturally would. I'm actually primarily interested in other topics, like philosophy and literature. Feels like being sucked into the Borg. Thought I was the only one. 🤔
I still do my thing but that might be minuscule autism
You're outsperging me. https://c.tenor.com/Rs3S9MM7txgAAAAd/tenor.gif
On 2) V4V to me means monetary value for non-monetary value. I understand that people want to monetize but incentive-wise there is a clear progression that usually takes place: niche -> reach -> monetization. Sorry to say but it’s not supposed to pay that much at this point. The positive about it: opportunity to build a very consistent, engaged, coherent fan base. On 3) I agree. Nostr is still very niche. Luckily bitcoin as niche connects to many other topics and sub cultures. I’m certain there is opportunity. It’s not as bleak as it might currently seem. The other driver is not so much content doscovery of passive users but modes of content creation and delivery for active users. What have Twitter, YouTube, instagram momentum was at least in equal parts the playfulness of new ways of self expression. Maybe that’s the even bigger potential for nostr. I know a very generic answer but I’m bullish on nostr
i think that being worried about people trying to post “zap-worthy” content for the sake of the zap rather the worth makes sense. there *can* be a sort of echo chamber when people post the same type of content others zappers post. however, i think that’s the beauty of this place. zaps are sort of a community signaling no? “i’m zapping you because i find your ideas valuable/i’d like to interact” so i think it really depends on the user (thankfully) to curate their community of zappers, and zap away with those they enjoy.
Social media in itself has become a lit garbage can of people only posting things to fit in, not actually sharing their inner selves. There is no solution. Most have been trained to do this for far to long, to the point of no return. Go along with it so people like me and maybe I get more opportunities to get further in life, = all social media today.
Your name is not on suggesting list (at the first time I join nostr), but I following you. Sometimes I didn’t like your notes, for this ☝️ more agree with you, algo is algo, even devs confirmed there is no algo on nostr. Devs create node, algo will followed
I don't see this sort of stuff, but I've been very careful not to follow people who I know posted this sort of stuff on Twitter. I made the active decision not to be exposed to that sort of content, which I see soooo much more of on Twitter. I'm also using a nym and have a relatively low follower count so few people make any assumptions about my race, gender or sexual orientation.
You’re describing your worries with people, not of the tools they use
Maybe a stretch, but here's a wall of an idea: (1) Let's move from relay pools as the town square, where everyone sharing an intersection of relays shares the same town square and move to relays as islands, closed off rooms etc. Similar to Reddit, but a theme is assigned to the relay, curated by the moderator(s) and community. More closed than what Satelite.earth has. (2) find better ways to aggregate notes and surface older content - diminishing the recency bias. Why (1)? With the wide perspectives we see from everyone, groups are not able to maintain a stable set of values. A permissionless wiki or community is not going to bring in specialized groups for fear of vandalism or being lost in the sea of other unrelated notes. Of course you have relay selection, but this is an afterthought in the town square model. How is a segregated nostr going to help with ingroup behavior? It doesn't explicitly, but it creates an environment at the base level that disincentivizes negative & reactionary behaviors between tribes because now you can choose to not have in your face if you don't care to see it. Set it in your community rules. Also, the real interesting stuff happens at the boundaries between communities - where relays don't need to be so strict with a specific theme. Where you can share relevant content across communities. Curation at the level of the user, dictated by what room they choose to be in at any given moment. (2) Now nostr is more segregated, what about visibility? How can we surface old content? Searching through tags and labels work, but in a very limited way because you want tags to be specific. If you don't have a defined term ontology for whatever topic it is care about, you're stuck with a resolution problem. You need to balance between trying to find the most relevent tags for a topic and throwing tangentially related tags to increase reach. Current functionality to share content is boosting, forking articles/notes and quote posting. Quoting, while used to change the context of a conversation or to aggregate multiple posts comes with its own set of problems. Similar to citations in papers, you're stuck temporally. Seeing the top level post means you see the new context, but you're going to have a problem finding where others have taken the conversation if you only see the bottom level. I've also seen quoting as a method for grouping notes together, but argue that its pretty ineffective for the previous reason. What makes this worse is that many clients are __feed based__. Meaning unless you see it in your feed, you're not going to find it without some text search, which is very limited if you're trying to explore a general topic. Two problems now, which many if not all clients face: Search resolution in text, tags/labels, and a temporal bias toward recency - incentivizing you to join in on the current conversation. Here are two specs. a) Modular articles, aka note collections, note collages, aka renderable lists with context: Originally developed to help search and segregate focused context within a larger article, modular articles group events together as its core functionality. Take a set of related events, group them together, and now they're all searchable under a single context. "Opinions on integrating alt coins for tips" "Vegetarian recipes" "Cool notes and events that happened this week on nostr" https://wikifreedia.xyz/nkbip-01/npub1m4ny6hjqzepn4rxknuq94c2gpqzr29ufkkw7ttcxyak7v43n6vvsajc2jl https://highlighter.com/laeserin/1719204947236 b) Embedded content: Without going into detail about the how, embedding models are a computational approximation of __meaning__ where you can compute distances between concepts. You want to find content that wasn't labeled or grouped and you don't know the exact words being said? Your best chance is through embeddings. Expensive, but effective and ideally used for content to be "caught" later like knowledge content or relevant notes. It makes little sense to embed everything someone shouts out their window. https://wikifreedia.xyz/nkbip-02/npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf Relays-as-islands helps users stay in their echo chamber if they'd like: Good for community security, but individuals pick the communities they want to participate in. Broadcasting, boosting and quoting now functions as a cross pollination mechanism, rather than a "hey followers check this out" Note collections help aggregate and surface old content as prescribed by the user given some context. Embedding models help for search resolution, with the optional capacity to throw in for a recommendation algorithm.
I think this is where developers are going. Not entire relays, but groups within and moderated on a relay. nostr:note1fmd6t4gwwxm4jzhvpar5dg92d5au55stp46djq0aqv4j6wvjvjnqn3xvgl
Since currently good Nostr clients are Twitter inspired, it is key to properly curate and update your following list. I did it recently, from +400 to 250 following and the experience improved. I would love to follow and stablish brotherhood. But many users share content that I don't care or offer me low signal. So I'm just fonna focuse on having a good following list.
More flexible filters, algorithms, that allow you to specify exactly what you want to see solve this right? Weren't you guys at nos.social building something that allowed that flexibility? I'm interested in this space too. I think there were other flexible clients too but I haven't researched much. What are the most flexible algorithm or filter customizable Nostr clients out there? Anyone aware?
sometimes see repeated repost becomes NOISE even a good note -
Reposts should be aggregated, yes. Only displayed once per feed.
yes - its burden on client side processing - same note ID filtered from feed. when i view global unfiltered feed it is fast the scrolling following feed.
1) Zaps don't really signal anything Nostr-native, yet, as most people follow (and therefore) zap the same handful of people that they followed over here from Twitter or that were in the "recommended follows" list, when they got here. It's all quite insular. 2) It's relatively rare for someone to get followed or zapped regularly because they are providing some value "on Nostr". There's only a small handful, who have accomplished that feat, who aren't devs of popular clients or one of the oldest accounts, and we basically had to work at it like it's a part-time job because discovery is so bad on here. 3) Hot takes that appeal to the ingroup get reposted because they are low-risk to the reposter. Truly novel or interesting material, that might unsettle the reader, rarely gets reposted for that reason. It reveals a tolerance or bias from the reposter than might surprise their followers. They only read that stuff in secret, often not even hitting the like. This results in reposted notes often being the dullest notes and akin to shouting "Amen!" in a church. Lots of attention at no personal cost. I suspect Twitter could detect such "lurker favorites" and surfaced the notes to a wider audience. 4) Topic-based discovery, and the uncovering of high-signal notes, is still abyssmal. Some teams (including ours, see liminal and the people working with nielliesmons) are trying to fix that, but it requires entirely new features, events, and/or clients. It's less about traditional, dynamic "algos" and more about manual or programmatic curation of npubs and events. Akin to clustering library books onto shelves, or selecting paintings for a gallery. 5) We shouldn't expect people to be any different on here, then on any other social media, or anywhere in society. Many people can barely read fluently and most have pedestrian tastes. Some only come on here to chillax, shitpost, and find out the buzz, and get their quality reading elsewhere. Popular culture is not high culture. The goal should be helping someone to cultivate their variation of "a high culture feed", if they so choose, but some npubs won't want that, or only want if for particular topics or social spheres. I live a mix of pop and high culture, depending upon my mood. Sometimes I just want to zap funny memes and crack jokes, and that's also okay.
Agree with so much here. I remember seeing someone calculating how many zaps they got now, the predicted if nostr grew 100x that their zap amount would likewise multiply. I found this totally unimaginable. We are just beta testing zaps and a possible v4v ecosystem which doesn't exist yet really. I don't mean to be mean, but a lot of the push and promotion of current content creators on nostr feels v forced. And that's totally fine. Again it all feels like a template for when/if those sorts of accounts actually come here organically.
It's like with Bitcoin. Laser-eyes to 100k started in February 2021. We're now at 58k, 3.5 years later.
Nostr is freedom. You're not gonna like all that free speech brings. I don't want someone or some group helping to "foster healthier online conversations." That is very twitter, facebook ,etc. Screw that. Take responsibility for your feed and unfollow users who post offensive (to you) content. Use a nostr app that curates to your liking. Covid opened the worlds eyes to the danger of groupthink and going along with the "experts." There needs to be a LOT of room for questioning things that seem like conspiracy theory to you. Even if they end up being not true. You trying to censor the polluted river theory sounds like the twitter files. I don't want any part of that here. Let the discussion happen, unfollow people that bother you. But let it happen.
This post is all over the place, threads is not new social media, and bluesky isn't nostr. Sounds like you should log in to nostr with some other folks npubs because you must have just fucked up your own feed for it to be this bad. Also, click bait is everywhere, good luck getting away from it.
Not everyone wants to use the Internet for 'healthy' or even productive conversations. For many, it's just entertainment. Not much you can do, other than being careful who you follow and muting people that are just too annoying.
As long as people are posting to “audiences” over “peers”, the platform is doomed to become the same toxic echo chamber as everywhere else. Nostr only guarantees the freedom to speak, to be un-ban-able. That’s all it’s really solving for. If we want better *communities*, we (the collective) should start optimizing for that with another layer on top of nostr. Personally, I think this is going to organically occur via apps using nostr as their delivery mechanism, but otherwise a tuned experience. These experiences will be opinionated. They will exclude some and invite others in (not literally, just based on the experience). But, that’s what a community *is*. That’s what a little tight-knit town *is*. If people are hoping for a place where *everyone* is be well-read, curious, and generally not a dick, it will never happen.
100% agree with your spot-on observation. But the cause could be more human related than algorithmic.
This is not what I'm seeing, actually. Very occasionally I block someone in the comments - nastiness or just trollish bs - because there's some stuff I don't need to see, but mostly I love my feed. Find it informative and thought-provoking. Can you (or someone) clarify: on Nostr, how would we see content from folks that we don't follow other than via reposts? I've never seen a post from someone that I don't follow. (Not the main point of your post, but the idea that as an amab queer you're just not supposed to post your personal experience in particular threads ... idk, that seems bizarre to me.)
it's my belief that mimicing traditional social media, particularly in feed/wall fast scroll and react/zap format is a mistake and exacerbates quick draw approaches
Yeah. It’s not that micropayments with zaps and lightning are bad, it’s more that we need to figure out a better model than just paying when you like something. We’ve got a lot of the micropayments stuff figured out technically but not the socio-technological system we really need yet. It’s something to explore. What’s beyond the feed and how do we fund social media without algorithm driven advertising.
Haven't seen as much outside of from people I am subscribed to and what they boost. Using noStrudel for reference. On how to fix these sorts of things I'm clueless. We can ask people to be nice and think before posting but it is the internet after all.
I think you aren’t giving enough credit “out of network” warnings in your app. I do not think I would like to converse with people who are beyond friends of friends. The real life analogy is that it is the set of people you might find yourself with at a dinner party. “Out of network” are sufficient.
Zaps as a mechanism is potentially worse than Likes. You could argue in such an early stage of a social media it might cause topic/tone stagnation reinforcing bitcointwitterisms and further alienating anyone outside of that culture joining and staying, forced 'positivity', zapfarming etc etc. It's also not impossible to imagine say someone or an organisation with enough funding and incentive to steer/nudge and monetarily incentize certain kinds of posts by zapping. Not saying this is the case ATM, cos nostr doesn't really have enough of a userbase maybe to do that. (But as I've often said I think we are the guineapigs, the beta testers of this whole project lol. We're sort of yet to see a proper v4v social media scenario here.) https://image.nostr.build/eaeb7580045620b99a11c0f6413717f5f977beaf2bcb9173dafc0d8c75f73ed2.jpg nostr:nevent1qqs8q44xl954ztkx0e6jadms690pj36eu8fsm66uefst6jhe9z6suhcprdmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdakj7q3qnjst6azswskk5gp3ns8r6nr8nj0qg65acu8gaa2u9yz7yszjxs9sxpqqqqqqzncnju6
I cant seem to zap this post. Lmk if you need help w/ setup
Underrated note. And I 100% agree. I think Zaps are not as useful as bitcoiners naively think. They become a little like likes anyway, bc they feel like random points (doesn’t feel like real money) and to Rabble’s point, points generally get allocated toward clickbait & sensationalism. You can only do so much with a single like, but you can really skew things by throwing a bunch of meaningless “points” at it (and yes - at this stage, zap sats are pretty meaningless)
Yes, totally agree with it being fuzzy Points. It's not the great 'signal' people often claim it is here. Doesn't create a new social (media) dynamic, you can still see eg parasocial zapping lol. Perhaps zaps have an element of old facebook's Poke thrown in too.
Yeah but it's the restraint chair I'm really worried about.
Yeah but it's the restraint chair I'm really worried about.
Yes, totally agree with it being fuzzy Points. It's not the great 'signal' people often claim it is here. Doesn't create a new social (media) dynamic, you can still see eg parasocial zapping lol. Perhaps zaps have an element of old facebook's Poke thrown in too.
Yeah but it's the restraint chair I'm really worried about.
OTOH anecdotes in nostr:note1qlzlqnhqnlnr2dpptpzrn44dkup29upalvyz0kpj59k3kr6j6ckqtu5tqh sound toxic. It seems people have different experiences on different services/protocols, I guess in part based on some path dependent thing of who they are following, conceivably even what bucket they are placed in if it's an algorithmic system. Lots of people report that twitter is a cesspool, and much more so recently. I've never experienced that, but then I don't look at big accounts or the "for you" feed much. On Mastodon I see almost no garbage, probably in part because I turn of retoots. Here I see almost no garbage, because I follow almost nobody. But if I look for garbage, it's in massive abundance on all of these (as well as BlueSky and Threads, just haven't looked in awhile). Twitter-style social media (all of the above are basically that) is kind of undifferentiated and general purpose, which means people don't necessarily get the experience they wanted without significant work including self-restraint. But for other styles of website/service, you pretty much know what you're there for and will get (eg reddit or particular subs; not that those experiences couldn't be improved, but at least there's some level of agreement among participants about what they're doing). I wonder if some kind of signaling of intent about what kind of interaction one is looking for, and use of that by clients, would be helpful. This is kinda accomplished on Mastodon-and-adjacent through instances, and on specific posts by some people with reply guidelines. But could same or better be accomplished without instances, and guide not only people who see posts, but guide people who want a style of interaction toward posts where the author signaled a compatible intent? There's a vast amount of people posting on any given topic (say NZ visit suggestions: aside if that's really what one wanted, as opposed to random convo, wouldn't they ask a search engine, chatbot, or Wikivoyage? but anyway...) and is there really any reason for people desiring trolling to not get that, for people who want affirmation to get that, for people who want literal-minded helpful responses to get that, etc? Anything else is wasting people's time. Well, except that figuring out what you want and taking time to signal it, may well be a bad use of time?