Wow, if that’s what he actually says in the video I do not want to unmute  🤢 

 Doesn't sound to me like he's advocating for it.  

 Don’t make me unmute… 

 I had the opposite impression actually. 

 exactly, don't shoot the messenger 

 Not at all 

 it sounds like he is not describing a possible scenario but a plan to how to make it happen. 

 It convinces people to bring back the guillotine 

 He is so honest about it , it’s almost like he,s on our side . 🤓 

 Antichrist Sytstem by mandating Mark of the beast for "future Stalins" 

 Wonderful. 
 

 So this is the direction of travel. This is not new.
How do we stop this?
 

 We stop this with Marty Bent zaps. 

 It’s not a secret how he does it, is it? 

 That little creature can get bent. 

 What people fail to see but this dude is explaining is that the tools of our imprisonment are the same in democracy as dictatorship. Also, that woman to his left is really digging what he's saying. 

 I don't get it, in the video he is clearly saying this is a bad thing, but wasn't he supposed to be defending it? 

 At the very end the connection he makes to Stalin is then disregarded in the final sentence. 

 How? I see him saying "worst dictatorships" and so on. 

 That’s what I’m seeing. He’s framing the legitimizing of these measures as a problem 

 Marty, would love a link to the original video for more context. I've seen this guy many times and he's easy to take clips from out of context. I'm not sure if it is because he is so hyper focused on what he's talking about or he just doesn't care to cloak his agendas like the typical elite. 

 Here is the source. Haven't had time to watch it yet though.
https://youtu.be/JfyIW9wRvB4 

 we gonna win anyway. let him talk. 

 I've seen him say these things before years back, before hearing about the wef or his connection with them, before c19.   But to me it seems he is just saying the risks of what could happend if technology develops in a dangerous way. Those older talk where full talks, so you'd see his build up, this here, this one is a excerpt.. 
Whatever others at the wef take of his words, maybe a blueprint, seems like it  🧐 
To judge him as evil, some kind of architect..Donno, Maybe just excited he and his book have gotten SOOO much attention from the rich/famous/powerful.

What you think, if Huxley of Orwell where alive today?? They would at least have gotten and invite to speak at the WEF, right?

So this man could be saying this, and here we give him attention, attention to his fearful imagination of an ugly future.   

 Stalin sounds like a really great guy! 

 Fuck em.  They already know what we think about them 

 You understand he is not saying it is a good thing, don’t you? 

 Yea Marty's being dishonest in posting this out of context.  

 That's not clear in many of his conversations where he stands. Does anyone have the source? What is clear is that the WEF is pro state and survalence.  

 Here is the source. Haven't had time to watch it yet though. From the clip it is not clear to me that he is saying this is not good. I think he may be saying it just is what it is. Regardless of what his feelings are about it, he's right. Things like this are great for anyone in power no matter what label they use.
https://youtu.be/JfyIW9wRvB4 

 He might want to sit this one out. 

 So essentially Stalin 2.0 is what you’re trying to achieve. 

 Can't stand this mug 

 Trojan horsing #DigitalIdentity, one crisis at a time. 

 He may be the devil's spawn. 

 He says this way you get the worst totalitarian regime ever. Total surveillance + ai to analyze it.

He is not wrong. 

 Fictions enable humans to cooperate better. - Yuval Noah Harari , Homo Deus 

 slavers designing and dictating new rules and implementing them withough consent from  anyone be like.... 

 Can a rich someone put a says bounty on him? 

 I've just watched the whole interview. Yuval in this section is warning that the same surveillance tech used to monitor people during covid could also be misused against people for totalitarian purposes. The point he's making IMHO is that this tech is a double edged sword that must be understood and used accordingly. He is certainly not advocating for using this tech to determine what you think about the government. On the contrary.  

 This fucking guy … 🤮 

 Just get within arms reach of me, you'll know 'what I think about government'. 

 predictions and warnings, not advice. 

 👌 

 often both, but if it is a future concept, you should definitely figure it is a prediction/warning. i am clear when i give advice; i usually say "you should do this". heh.

geopolitics are always viewed through the lens of what was, is now, and what causes result while keeping in mind the deeper narratives and shadow causes. and timeline differentiation. i often know who the shadow actors are, so i also have to factor in if it is something in my personal narrative impacting the stories (which is where we are at the moment). 

i am generally writing front content 18 months to 5 years ahead and rewriting in real time as you all ignore me and fuck to anyway despite the warnings. it is great fun. ;) 

 and incidentally that ship sailed almost 20 years ago with convincing people to behave according to medical protocols. the middle class was built on class compliance in exchange for upward mobility as a reward. the pandemic was a test to see how compliant millenials really were. and now we know. the next test cycle will be prob within the next 3-5 years. only it will be more impactful on the heels of the societal destruction of the previous pandemic. less tolerance, less health, less patience, less reliance, less community. 

 hi Jack, when are you going to delete your X account?😝 

 Yup he’s clearly speaking out against these measures that the pandemic legitimized and explaining how they can now be used “even in democratic countries” as opposed to just dictatorships. 

 breathe. advice. 

 Yeah, the measures that were used to deal with the so called Corona pandemic! It’s historical turning point for the worst. 

 He’s saying this a bad thing and that it was key in legitimizing measures that will make totalitarian governments more effective. But he’s with you and speaking out against it. Watch until the end 

 We need him saying these things, to motivate us to code harder on freedom tech to resist this evil motherfucker.