"Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns—or dollars. Take your choice—there is no other—and your time is running out."
#AynRand
#AtlasShrugged
#BTC
Can you block bots on Nostr?
I have a @LynAlden and @Natalie imperators following me.
I see mute. I need to do a better job of keeping my Nostr network clean than I did my Twitter network.
Is mute the same thing?
I don’t know, but I do know that when my kids get their first house I am going to flood the bathroom, leave all the lights on, and swing on the railing until it busts off 😂
Hi, @Dr. Jeff , I see from your LP letter TPL is still one of your bigger holdings.
2 things I’d love to get your thoughts on: besides BTC it is my second largest holding. I feel it’s gotten over its skis a little in terms of multiple. I still feel it’s a forever asset (side thoughts on that?); can you talk me off the “I’m going to sell it and buy it back cheaper” ledge please! Or do you have a different view?
I also “took a flyer” (I did read the IPO documents) on the Landbridge IPO. Not right at the IPO price but soon after. Have you looked at LB to any degree? Any thoughts? Less O&G royalty revenue as you know. But I do like that the surface holdings are more contiguous than TPL’s generally. Seems to offer more optionality for industrial opportunities.
Any thoughts appreciated!
It’s a great question. It would seem to me that it corresponds to reality that there IS an objective point of reference out there somewhere.
I do not believe any human can fill that role.
Perhaps it’s a clue to the necessity for something transcendent.
Well if it’s even half as quality as Broken Money then please do.
Side note, can I ask you a question about fractional reserve banking I’ve never seemed to be able to get straight?
Although it also just hit me. Ukraine’s really not getting any money either…it’s all going to arms makers, arms dealers, and the middlemen (whomever they may be).
So there’s that I suppose?
🎯
The money - itself - is not the thing of value.
Money merely REPRESENTS that which has value in economic activity.
So the question is not “what’s the most valuable money?”
The question is “what medium best fills the role of representing that which has value?”
💯
We want, classically, something durable, fungible, divisible, portable, and scarce.
For myself I would then say that a medium having those properties will lead to said medium being selected by the market as the chosen money, which will in turn lead to said money maintaining its purchasing power over time, or, “holding it’s value”.
Saying the same thing at the end of the day 🤝
I don’t think Saylor was saying, or thinks, that Bitcoin itself will be lent and paid back at interest.
I could be wrong of course.
I think he envisions a world that looks a lot like today. But instead of manhattan real estate being the best collateral and property, Bitcoin will be the pristine and most desired property. But still with all things fiat surrounding it.
Whether he is right or wrong or whether that is an ideal future or not aside.
But I agree was a thought provoking convo!
I agree with this completely.
I think it’s going to take a long time.
And I think if/once BTC completely displaces fiat no one will accept yield denominated in fiat at all.
And this is where I think during that conversation they were each talking from the perspective of two totally different worlds.
I agree with what Saif said, capital will only be able to be resisted through equity. Why? Because the produce of a business can always expand. So ”yield” can come from production and sharing in that production, regardless of what the prices of the produce are (going down).
So in a sense, the nominal yield in Bitcoin terms will be negative. But the real yield will be positive.
Question though @james !
How exactly does it work?
1) $100 dollars deposited at institution A, A keeps $10 (with a 10% reserve ratio), and lends out $90, the $90 gets deposited at B, who keeps $9 and lends out $81, and so on and so forth until the $900 is created, or
2) can A hold the $100 and create $900 worth of loans straight away?
And if it’s 2) wouldn’t institution B then be able to create $9,000 of loans straight away from the $900!?!?
The Bitcoin Standard will always have a special place for me of course.
But is it sacrilege in the community to say Broken Money is a more important work imho?
Notes by Brett | export