@86b332f6 BTW, I have a lemon squeezer and grater that feels very much like this. I wonder if the architect had that in mind when he designed this place.
@86b332f6 it's a tough place to shoot with the wide angle, because that lens tends to send lines flying in every direction if you move a couple of inches off center.
Next time I think I'll embrace the skewing and shoot asymmetrically.
@ab25e353 Oh my goodness, no. I was still learning yow to look through the viewfinder way back then. The only thing I knewwas how to rotate the camera to make panoramas and glue them together in my scrapbook. *chuckles*
I don't know if they still do it but when I was growing up, portrait photographers used to say "look at the birdie and smile."
Anyway, here is the film camera I used in the 1980s and 90s: the Pentax ZX-50. It's still floating around the house somewhere but the battery contacts have corroded due to battery acid leakage.
#photography
https://files.sfba.social/media_attachments/files/111/183/021/040/119/830/original/0e7f0f4f79464e74.jpg
@5f59e153 I remember Y2K well. I was in charge of Y2K projects at Hewlett-Packard... a massive 3 year effort to upgrade software across the company before the critical date. Nothing happened. I went down to San Francisco's Ferry Building, watched the fireworks, and drank good champagne straight from the bottle.
In a few hours, across the U.S.A, cellphones will make an unpleasant sound. Do not be alarmed! It's just FEMA testing the Emergency Alert System.
Unless it's more.
According to cultists, today's test is the start of an zombie apocalypse. The cultists claim the 5G broadcast signal has been designed to activate Marburg Virus nanoparticles in COVID vaccines and virus will turn us all into zombies.
Okay!
Seriously, I'm not worried. This is not my first Apocalypse, nor my second or third. But in any case, Happy 5G Zombification Day, everyone!!!
#photography
https://files.sfba.social/media_attachments/files/111/177/544/697/014/146/original/ce53fe813b938008.jpg
@796af16b@796af16b
Q: Say I'm using the Mastodon app, looking at photos posted by other people on different instances. And maybe one looks great...so I decide to see what other photos that person has posted.
But in the app, I can only see remote photos back to 2-4 weeks (unless someone on my own instance has boosted the photo). I get it. My instance can't keep a copy of every photo in the fediverse - there has to be a limit.
I've learned that if I want to see someone's portfolio, I need to use my browser and essentially do my viewing as a guest on the remote instance, with limited functionality to like or comment while not logged in.
My question is: why can't the Mastodon app make an external lookup itself and show me an old photo from inside the app, without me having to switch to a browser? Is that a difficult thing for an app to do - to fetch old photos for a quick look-see on my phone or tablet, on demand, without burdening my instance with storing that photo?
Does that question make sense?
@722bd124@58b2274a Bad wordplay :)
As for monogamy, statistics offers zero moral judgment when it comes to distributions, even when plotting one's number of lifetime partners. We all fall somewhere on the curve and its standard deviants.
@722bd124@58b2274a Bad wordplay :)
As for monogamy, statistics offers zero moral judgment when it comes to distributions, even when plotting one's number of lifetime partners. We all fall somewhere on the curve and its standard deviants.
@58b2274a The work-from-home/work-in-the-office pendulum has swung back and forth several times since the 1990s. I expect it will continue swinging for a while still.
@58b2274a@74c65fe5.
On my last day of work, before retiring, I calculated that in the course of commuting for 30 years to workplaces in Palo Alto and Santa Clara, I traveled 780,000 miles on Interstate 280.
780,000 miles!
That's like making a trip to the moon, and back again, and then returning to the moon. Plus a couple of orbits on each end.
Time-wise (at 2.5 hours a day), if you put all that commute time together into one block, it adds up to 2 solid years of my life wasted on Interstate 280.
A chunk of that was in a 2 or 3 person carpool. But still, my carbon footprint is unforgivably huge. And the wear and tear on my cars and body... ugh.
@84f2fcd5 Not sure about what kinds of lights these were but I have had terrible experiences with colored LEDs. My Pentax camera sensors seem to hate them. Incandescent do much better.
Forgive me for reposting a picture from 10 or 11 months ago, but there are a lot of new people here... and I'm rather fond of this shot.
Anyway, here is an illustration from my once planned but still unpublished children's book.
I call it "God Didn't Take Your Brother, Billy. The Monster Under Your Bed Did"
#WindowFriday #FensterFreitag #photography
https://files.sfba.social/media_attachments/files/111/149/603/279/979/091/original/0de898d55c7beed9.jpeg
@86b332f6 This was only a 3 or 4 second exposure - fairly short - and I was planning to do something longer. But damn, it was too fucking cold and windy up there that night.
I took 7 shots and 6 of them were unusable because of the camera shak from the wind. So I went to Safeway (2 blocks away), got some gin, and came home to make a martini.
I'll go back and try shooting here again on a less windy night.
@133a688f Aye.
I would definitely content warn if a picture involved sexual activity or genital nudity. But hiding fetish gear or gay life(?) would be wrong, IMHO. It would feel like censoring something because it might give someone who is conservative the vapors.
It's a poorly marked line, being on an instance that is both family friendly and also representative of a wide spectrum of Bay Area communities. I try to stay mindful of that, and not post things blatantly inappropriate.
@0b7652aa Damnit. The elevation at our front door is 60 meters. We're going to be about 6 meters short of surviving the ice cap melt.
Our roof, however, would make a nice fishing pier 👍
Notes by Bob Horowitz | export