The phenomenon of it being colder in the morning than at night, particularly just after dawn, can be explained by several factors related to how the Earth’s surface and atmosphere interact with solar radiation.
*Radiational Cooling*
During a clear, calm night, the ground rapidly loses heat through a process called radiational cooling. The ground radiates infrared radiation into space, cooling down quickly. This cooling effect is enhanced by clear skies, dry air, and light winds, which allow the heat to escape more efficiently without being trapped by clouds or moisture.
*Ground and Air Temperature*
The ground cools faster than the air above it. As the ground loses heat, it chills the air in direct contact with it, creating a layer of cold air near the surface. This cold air can be several degrees colder than the air just a meter or two higher.
*Sunrise and Heat Absorption*
When the sun rises, its initial rays are weak and at a low angle. It takes time for the incoming solar radiation to counteract the rate at which the ground is losing heat. Until the sun is higher in the sky and stronger, the ground continues to release the heat it built up from the previous day, rather than absorbing new heat to warm up the temperatures.
*Air Mixing*
As the sun rises, it can create convective currents and turbulence that mix the colder air near the ground with the warmer air above. This mixing brings the colder air up to the level where temperatures are measured (typically at eye level), resulting in a recorded drop in temperature.
#askAI 🤭
Things that are better than any hardware wallet:
- freshly set up computer for wallet generation, export xpub for stacking over watch only wallet, computer wiped after initialization.
- @SeedSigner
- diversified compartmentalization
- multisig
Don't be the HWW vendor's bitch.
#Bitcoin is freedom tech. Act accordingly.
Worshipping of hardware wallet providers, while actively distracting from alternatives such as multisig through scaremongering. Completely uncritical acceptance of the security risks of hardware wallets (vendor, supply chain, etc.). The latest example is bitkey. Hyped by big names although extremely questionable concept.
Yes, and I'm a big fan of it. However, the narratives being spun are damaging and there is a lot of multisig FUD being actively used to prevent adoption as I see it.
Two keys are on servers as I see it. The key from your mobile is stores on your cloud service. So if you’re using a iPhone that would be iCloud. What else happened with this key is unknown (to non technical users at least).
Ultimately it’s personal risk assessment and a decision one has to make but I would definitely prefer a multisig without HW over the bitkey as it is right now.
You say signing devices. That’s the correct way of looking at it. Most speak of wallets though. The subtle art of applying fiat terminology to lock people in
Bitcoiners cheering for Trump.
Bitcoiners cheering for Saylor.
Bitcoiners cheering for ETFs.
Bitcoiners cheering for Bitkey.
…
Some people here are either becoming increasingly stupid or decreasingly #bitcoin and it shows.
I hope you're right, and for some individuals you certainly are, but at scale I don't think it's going to work because bitcoin is being bought faster than it's being understood and the growth rate is exponential. We'll end up with a lot of bitcoiners who aren't really bitcoiners. Also, bitcoin may wake people up, but it won't make them smart. At least not in the short term.
Tl;dr unfortunately no
How is this a hardware wallet?
2/3 of your keys are stored on servers.
Meanwhile, you're locked into your "hardware wallet" with no way to access your private key or move to another one.
Oh, and you have to provide an email address, because why not, I guess... I mean, Satoshi used email. How bad can it be? 😂
Natural selection in the artificial world. A great filter for stupidity.
People who make that decision shouldn't be making decisions. So maybe that's a good thing.
Smart people will increasingly make decisions for others by proxy.
AI as an interface to your rulers. Same same but different.
A bit of privacy we got already and it keeps increasing with adoption. I’m not at all concerned about this in the long run.
Too many people opting for custodial solutions is a much bigger problem affecting privacy too.
Statism runs deep, even among bitcoiners. I also wonder why those who say "everything is good for bitcoin" then decide to vote as "single issue voters" for Trump and the like. Doesn't make sense.
Just to clarify... by "simplifying bitcoin self-custody" you mean keeping 2 out of 3 private keys on servers while preventing users from exporting the third key from the "hardware wallet", effectively locking users in?
Luckily we’re living in a world where women have a greater say in things and can save us with their magical empathy 😍
Oh wait… it’s women discussing this shit 😄
Voting is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. But it doesn't mean you're an idiot just because you voted. Especially not in the short term.
This is one of the top violent agreements among Bitcoiners I guess
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by imnuso | export