#Anarchism is not a political position. It's a moral conclusion that holds true regardless of its degree of practicality.
This conclusion is: there is no way to make violence generally acceptable for a social structure.
As a consequence, it's to be seen as a completely unacceptable but omnipresent human reality. As simple as that.
Being #AnCap isn't so much about being an economic smartass as it is about not being an asshole.
Legacy Media Developing Full Trump Psychosis. Every article: TRUMP.
JFC, if these people hate him so much, why not refrain from making him the only topic on planet earth!
Agreed.
It's hard to discard a way of thinking that's 99% true, I guess. However, discrediting this model just means you don't like any kind of model in general. Doesn't get more fundamental than that imo.
It boils down to, "Bro, what if bitcoin stops behaving the way it has for the last 15 years?"
Yeah that’s called uncertainty. Live with it. lol
Fair enough, but it's just painful to read. On the other hand, it's nice because it makes adoption a little more predictable. A little more time to stack is appreciated. 😅
Because they have empathy with the victim of the story and don't realize that it takes a victim to have empathy in the first place.
90% of therapists stabilize a harmful condition. That is cruel. 10% helpful therapy doesn't make up for it.
When family members of alcoholics do this shit, we call it codependency, but when a shrink does it, we call it therapy. Funny.
Good take. Some things only work if they're general and open.
@giacomozucco has talked a lot about the role of a large enough anonymity set for some privacy tools to work properly.
I think this is a similar effect. From that point of view, there was no alternative to opening Tor to the public. Makes perfect sense.
Btw, using hardware wallets instead of standard hardware increases risk for the same reason: it marks you as part of a relevant and smaller subset.
Notes by imnuso | export