No idea, it's a many-to-many transaction.
I can't remember ever seeing so much RBF activity on a single transaction, other than a simple chain with ever increasing fees.
Be aware that these type of videos can't be played on Chrome/Linux. Not sure what you could do against this. I see it's hosted on @primal, maybe they can give a warning?
European Court of Justice: Police may search phone for minor crimes
The European Court of Justice has ruled that police services may search the telephones of persons involved in minor crimes. EU member states must have a clear legislative framework for this and prior permission is required for non-urgent cases.
"If access to data on mobile phones is restricted to serious crimes, this could seriously limit the investigative capabilities of the authorities," the Court wrote in a press release . According to the Court, the risk of impunity for criminal offences could also increase in that case. The Court stipulates that EU Member States must have a legislative framework in place that specifies with sufficient precision when and in which cases an interference with a person's private life is legally valid, and in which cases it is not. Law enforcement agencies that wish to access data on a data subject's mobile phone must, in non-urgent cases, obtain prior consent. Such consent may be granted by a judge or by an independent administrative authority. The data subject whose data is accessed must also be informed of the grounds on which such consent was given.
The European Court of Justice is providing further clarification on a recent court case in Austria, in which a suspect's mobile phone was accessed by the police. The suspect, who was arrested after being caught with 85 grams of cannabis, had sued the police for taking his phone and attempting to search it.
https://image.nostr.build/60c247ebf016e3d806fd10771207cf4f1c62405c0ee2658034fd7c789d09cb0f.jpghttps://image.nostr.build/54aa0246c13da64fb2013897db3736dd41a91f556869ce344d2c24b2367df786.jpg
Source: https://tweakers.net/nieuws/227336/europees-hof-van-justitie-politie-mag-telefoon-doorzoeken-bij-kleine-misdrijven.html
Correct, it has a very limited scope. It's a zapper service, so the only NWC action implemented is pay_invoice. The other methods aren't necessary for this.
Extending this to a complete NIP-47 implementation should be possible and not even that hard, but I'm not familiar when one would use this?
Ligess is basically Alby Hub for LND. It's both a Lightning address server, as well as a zap handler. So one can send zaps and receive zaps directly from LND, as well as receive payments to your lightning address on your own domain.
I haven't used Alby Hub, so not sure how they are similar/different to each other. As for my implementation, exposing the balance would be a security issue, as any app that is connected through NWC has access to that.
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by mutatrum | export