I am very wprried about the place she wants to put everyone in.
Me thinks that some are more equal than others in her eyes.
So some people might end up at the same place as others, you know, the same but different, but still the same.
Look, as a nostr user, I'm just going to offer a post-mortem opinion.
I like the people involved, but I never understood why it was a good product. Not saying it wasn't, I'm saying comms were not clear enough as to the benefits.
I'll bite.
1) why is that good ?
2) what are the chances they lose the sats ?
3) what are the privacy garantees?
4) Is there any restrictions to spending I should know about ?
5) how does that compare to e-cash like e-nuts ?
I have a ton of questions
Blame the immigrants is a massive strawman from the left.
The immigrants just want a better place to live, that's understandable.
Complaining about immigration policy is the real gripe of the right. The left just deflects by calling it racism.
There's a massive difference between the authorized level of immigration in the USA and the actual level. Border enforcement is in shambles.
🤔🤔
Major Hunger games vibe
nostr:nevent1qqstqf067v0vpr86c5zz69j8auj3ntrudqj56m6gaunm25c2h6e2uvgpzfmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82cszyrtgfck0cg3wqhg2rtkf2szka4vvgwnpvpv83630hzp3p240weq6yqcyqqqqqqg4vqn3f
What we love :
Freedom for us
Freedom for others
Freedom of ideas
Ownership over content
What we need (not just for Nostr) : Better key management tools.
I need yo say it.
Grilling will give you cancer.
That fat hitting the coals and sizzling turns into carcenirogens and is then coating your meat which in turn you eat.
Legit plenty of uncles that LOVED grilling have had stomach cancer at a young age.
Cut that bad habit if you wanna see your grandchildren.
You've been warned. Also lose some weight before you're diabetic too.
How to get your hand chopped off.
nostr:nevent1qqsq8jq0du5rhd4vgu8jgjk06gyaua4rwy94qm6gjej9f9a3ew9m3lcpzfmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82cszyq0x0h3h2st3quwne7d5fdh9g67eflg29j3lkndmkxc9g6zujytwgqcyqqqqqqg2ey4eu
it's nice to preach to the choir here, but in reality that is a very poor sales pitch considering the risks involved.
in fact new people (with low information) will act (rationally from their perspective) and loto-ticket a lump sum.
The DCA stuff is for long-term convicted savings. A new person will not follow that advice, neither should they. They can't differentiate well BTC from ETH from penny stocks. You could give the same pitch for any asset and it would be, in most cases, very dumb to commit long term cash-flows to it.
Fwiw
eh.... they just confirmed what we already knew.
For extrajudicial actions to be taken, one must be above the law.
I don't think you can direct the military and be judged by standard criminal law.
why fire protection.
I think I'm more a minarhist because I believe, and I'm pretty sure I'm right, that without use of military and police, the neighboring organizations will use violence successfully to annex volontarists.
For voluntarism to thrive, one needs to be able to provide indispensible goods to neighborhood AND have enough of a dissasive threat of violence to discourage annexation. AND have a way to have other people behave in civil society that is not police.
So basically, without practical solutions to hose problems, the only viable ideal is minarchism.
Even then, the policing needs to be quite extensive with regulations to keep the peace and not poison rivers or have a bunch of accidents.
leadership assignment isn't an issue.
Unfettered power is.
Consider a world where any new law may be defeated if 15% of the population votes against it. What war is going to be waged ? What restrictions of freedom may be voted in ? What overspending may be engaged in ?
Many such checks may now be implemented with public key cryptography.
Leaders are fine. Rogue agents as leaders are not.
No one is going to talk about how that hand is placed ? the girl bending has a correct hand placement. wtf happened with the walking girl ? she met a midget ?
How does OP_CAT's risks can be fenced out to limit risks associated with it compared to other proposals that have a similar stated goal?
How does OP_CAT advances self custody solutions in regards to inheritance and 5$ wrench attacks / kidnappings ?
Is OP_CAT creating a new de-facto crypto dividend ?
If there is a new soft-fork with CAT, what are the considerations regarding the new players in the space : Saylor / ETFs / Nationstates / Politicians?
Looking forward to listen !
I see what you mean now.
I don't understand qhy we don't just use some kind of waterfall HD keys like in bitcoin.
Master nsec--> derive multiple nsec
When you see a key with a higher derivation number you consider all previous keys compromised and mark the messages with those keys as compromised.
They can fork off at any time.
Why haven't they done so already?
Why are they bragging about the ability to do so ?
Mainly because they know they can't, it would be disastrous for them to be excluded.
All they are trying to do is to incite some sort of compromise by showing their strength even if their strenght is insufficient to hold them on their own.
CBDC = the mark of the beast
C = 3 x B = 2 => 6
D= 4 + B = 2 => 6
C = 3 x B = 2 => 6
Without it one won't be permitted to buy or sell.
Resistance will be prosecuted.
The profecy predicts that compliance will be rewarded by nuclear fire.
Resist brothers, so that your progeny thrives in the future.
They wanna stop freedom money to put a chip in your hand: The mark of the beast, checksum 666. Those who don't have it won't be permitted to buy or sell. Those who resist will be persecuted and executed. Isn't that what the bible had predicted?
immediate punishment at the first sign of refusal.
There is a place and time for self determination and independent thinking. Sadly that place and time is not in front of your parents when you're three.
Giving chances and being lenient just teaches him that you really aren't serious about anything until you get mad about it and act.
Things get alot easier when they know you always mean business.
To clarify to the weirdos out there : I'm not talking about pain compliance. I'm talking about either removal of dopamine inducing items (toys and TV) or temporary restrictions on movements (time outs).
Thought experiment:
You have a constitutional law that says : any vote in parliament (or house or whatever) is subject to a 15% popular veto. Meaning any 15% of the population can strike down any law as an added condition for votes.
This would result in very limited government after a while. The obly things that would pass would be lateral adjustments that everyone thinks are needed.
From that point we extrapolate to the current situation where the population has a 0% veto on any vote. That means that government has the freedom to expand because they get to burden future governments with long term liabilities.
So what we can conclude is that voting does nothing but involving yourself in the political process via say : lobbying and representatives in both the bureaucracy and elected officials does ALOT with few ressources.
Involvement is thus a moral duty for Brave bitcoiners.
I'm so sorry to have a time preference that is limited to my own lifetime..... I guess I should accept that everything goes to shit and hope for things to get better after I die ......
If you're not subscribed, you are failing your duty as a bitcoiner to be educated on the important aspects of the protocol.
nostr:nevent1qqsy39fp5v7suepc7x9c80wda6fr6dr2s8lumlj7mquukg2546es5tcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyr5dvlzrtf99jvzwzs2zsr549mlp00jz2n72y7gkha3lnae72j46gqcyqqqqqqgxzjhkf
Well there are important points to consider.
Having more bitcoiners is better than having less. Why ? Because it prevents all kinds of nasty social attacks in meat space. And some violent ones too.
Also, not having privacy ends up taking censorship resistance out of bitcoin.
So like, I understand the carefulness to improve the protocol, but "pure store of value" ends up being "pure pile of shit".
Bunch of wrong assumptions here :
I said more bitcoiners not more ETF holders. More bitcoiners is by definition more decentralization.
Privacy solutions do not necessarily entail supply cap obfuscation. For example : coinjoin, payjoin etc...
Notes by RamenCoffee | export