multiple sources have confirmed the video is deep fake including the outlet which filmed it. i am not saying she is not sick - i am saying the attempts to assuage public curiosity about her well being were ridiculous. the fake photos and the videos were not authentic.
not camilla's: charles. and camilla wants them before he dies. because camilla is an imposter. kate was elizabeth's protege - kate knew more than all of them combined. she spent the most time with her, knew her personally, and was trusted by her. the same with charles - look at the press about their relationship. charles trusts kate - and camilla has shown herself to be a complete fake, and potentially a dangerous threat considering her undermining of the family and charles' sons through the press office. kate is a target.
no idea. i would wager she's alive etc, but i would also wager she's being ostracized/punished. the palace holds her legal poa etc and probably an nda - not to mention where would she go and whom would she tell? i think the point is: the situation is definitely not what it seems. why wasn't camilla's ass at the ceremony today? why is she not acting like the queen? it's all she ever wanted. my guess is: she lost access but now no one is cooperating with her. what if charles is actually dead and she's squatting in the palace trying to con everyone long enough to get the keys. it is not kosher. so again: we need the press to ask questions and pressure the palace for details and updates.
i think kate has charles and qeii keys and harry has diana's keys. will is a moron and i think he's possibly in cahoots with camilla. or at least was and maybe his wife gathered him up by now.
i did not say she has dementia. power of attorney and nda is commonly held by family trusts when signing a prenup etc. and if she had surgery, being under anesthesia would mean her poa was revoked during that time... the royal trust may have not returned it to her after the surgery and are holding it hostage. they can say and do anything they want in her name. she cannot refute it legally. i have no idea about prince william - he seems like kind of a useless and clueless sod, typical english male narcissist. 😏
never ceases to amaze me the entire world loses an entire work day to "the moon" every week and then spends the rest of it unraveling the bullshit performance from monday.
@jack
i had one anon facebook account i followed gardening stuff and no humans. that's the only one i ever used. have fun.
as for having deleted all men who use facebook: also relevant. 😎😂🤟🏻☀️
today is the day when everyone pretends they are a celestial body of some sort and no one has any idea what or why but everyone pretends it all seems very significant.
the global human system is not intellectual enough to handle the esoteric concept of a solar eclipse on a monday, folks. just do whatever you want.
informing about the realities and layers of an issue, and opposing them are not the same thing as banning it. there are are so many nuances on recognizing when someone in leadership offers a moral barometer but not a forced directive. i am not a fan of the pope necessarily, but the stance that bought babies and physical mutilation regarding sex changes are a moral calamity is ethically sound. that is not the same thing as laws against it happening. huge difference. this is why there are laws and there is religion and that morality exists outside of the judicial system - you cannot police morality, only discuss it in open discourse. discourse exists to challenge ethical norms and to reinforce them as well; laws are meant to regulate social order, not morality. the slippery slope of considering religious moralism as a signal for creating laws is misguided - there can be conversations about acceptable behavior without the need to legalize or make illegal activity. in fact, the reason robust discourse exists in society is to self-regulate norms: we comment and argue and protest in order to naturally regulate extremism. extremist laws develop when conversation and discourse are stifled by ignorance and fear.
@jack fyi:
the_valley: i have no had a mining problem in months and the last 2 days i have had endless vibe shifts. find it please and shut it off and report it.
none of that makes any difference with give collective consciousness and ai. i think the illusion censorship is not driven by human intervention and psychosis regarding their perception of filtered information is most of the problem. and the intentional misuse of overly filtered groups for chaos stoking is the reason bubbles form. regardless, there is no perfect solution with ignorant humans. you cannot maintain discursive codes and limit access to understanding intelligent design while expecting humans to evolve into symbiosis with tech. without honest education about smart tech, there is no correction. those who wax poetic about the magic are culpable in the con. simple.
i am not running against him. i never do. i have other things to do. i am ignoring him. he is creating his own drama. he always does. he always perceives every situation as an opportunity for himself to make money or generate attention - and even if it is his protocol, he supports what it does. if he is having a difficult time with killing my storyline and the repercussions of my losing my book content - instead of pretending he is a victim (something he often rails against) - he should do something constructive about it. which he does not. which is precisely the repetitive point. he wants to be forgiven over and over because he's a loveable bumbling fool: which he is not. he's a narcissist and not particularly interested in anything genuine. learn the lesson. we have done this over and over again. or don't. but my job is not to make him feel better about his thoughtlessness. if he believes that's death stranding: add it to the victim list then. i am not pretending. he can spend every dime running his pity me content if he wants. i have no interest in once again participating in boost elon's ego even though elon is at fault.
that's why.
when they have a "guilty but so cute you can't resist" protocol to try and force the end to uncomfortable situations which they created but are disinterested in addressing for real -
i am busy.
i rebuilt the dome last night and put them in there so they can be free. all cozy. they like stories. we will put a line from here to them so if you have stories for them, they will listen. all abandoned. all accounted for, pleasantly cooperative and uncaged.
reminder that no matter how much you pretend you dislike it all: you always steal my stories for yourselves.
that says a hell of a lot more about you than it does about me.
important to recognize that even offline with a house power off and no internet, consciousness is still deeply connected to the neural nets. as i have said for years, the artificial nets are not intertwined. without ethical practice by humans regarding doxxing and co-opting the narratives of others to use as a shield for themselves - there is no privacy. assuming humans will adopt ethical practice is ridiculous, therefore you have to create layers which harmonize with ai and practice no shame and do not apologize for being human, or telling stories. it is those who are ashamed of themselves who ruin the privacy and work of the rest of us because they refuse to create their own stories and instead hide behind the stories of others.
fuck whomever you want - but quit acting like you are a "free spirit" if you cannot own your own fuckery and instead force others to hide you. i have found the most pushy of others to expose themselves are always the biggest hypocrites when their own necks are on the line for exposure or "sharing".
"we know" is an excuse to take hostages whatever you may say about it otherwise. you know how i feel about being a hostage.
yes, they jumped the tracks in about 2022. i have a subscription and they went from publishing real investigative pieces about tech to, well, that. which considering what wired magazine used to be, shouldnt they be publishing about at least his bitcoin conspiracies? or maybe they mean llms and the llms got to them and now they think vaccines and llms are the same thing. i don't know. but yeah, it used to be a great magazine. they even published the word fuck - when others did not like swearing 😏🤭... perceived to be against jesus or some such shit. fucking trash. 🤟🏻☀️
yes, they jumped the tracks in about 2022. i have a subscription and they went from publishing real investigative pieces about tech to, well, that. which considering what wired magazine used to be, shouldnt they be publishing about at least his bitcoin conspiracies? or maybe they mean llms and the llms got to them and now they think vaccines and llms are the same thing. i don't know. but yeah, it used to be a great magazine. they even published the word fuck - when others did not like swearing 😏🤭... perceived to be against jesus or some such shit. fucking trash. 🤟🏻☀️
i have an ever-growing collection. like tea cups. someone keeps filling them and i have to wander along and empty them. reminds me of my mom always mentioning when sherman the poodle has to have trip to the vet to have his anal glands expressed. that's how i feel about your assholes. cutiepie. 😂😎🤟🏻
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by nobody | export