Thanks for this.

I’m familiar with (essentially) the three levels of law:

1. Equitable (what’s fair and right)
2. Common (God given)
3. Contract (what we agree to)

I’m in the process of moving from the public to the private with our business; via private express trust functioning as a UBO/PMA.

My question as it pertains to real estate I guess is this:

We are looking to buy a home in the coming Months.

This would be via a private seller who will hold the “mortgage” (note).

Seller has already offered some initial terms such as they would hold the note at 7% interest with a certain amount down payment.

In a perfect world I want that 7% to be simple interest (not amortized). I think that is merely a matter of us clarifying that with seller.

Likewise I think we can just do a private bill of sale with seller having a lien on the property (as the “mortgage”).

I assume the home is listed with the county register and property taxes are being paid by the current owner.

Once we purchase (via bill of sale with lien) the home, isn’t there steps we have to (are supposed to) take with the county to record the transaction?

Or is this where you are saying, in lieu of recording the sale with the county we send an affidavit attesting we as the new owners do not contract with the county?

Lastly, I do know if we have our trust be the owner of the property (do the transaction with the seller instead of us personally) we should be able to just record with the county an internal private transaction ID number but leave the details of which property was acquired inside the trust’s transaction records (thus keeping it private instead of public)…is that enough to eliminate the property taxes? 

 Almost guaranteed that Nothing you do will "eliminate" your property taxes. The county is extorting you and will attempt to foreclose no matter what if you don't pay - its a matter of preparing for and defending the foreclosure lawsuit when it comes along from the county.

1. You can indorse the property tax bill and send it in as a negotiable instrument payment pursuant to UCC article 3
2. You can rescind all contract with the county by an affidavit stating so, and that you are not receiving what you consider consideration from whatever contract they may have
3. I would still file the new deed in the property records if you buy, in the name of your trust or whoever.

See onestupidfuck.com for details about payment of bills via indorsement. 

 Thanks for the insight. 

 You have to study the principles of contract law and have enough braincells to see your defense from those principles (which I'm sure you do) and perform that defense in court.

Or you have to understand bills as negotiable instruments, namely UCC article 3 (codified in FL statutes too, just google it) and know how to perform on the bill with an indorsement and negotiate it by mail to the county  

Ideally both. You can win the foreclosure lawsuit easily if you stand your ground on these facts of law. 

 So I’ve seen a few TikTok vids on paying credit cards, buying cars, and paying utility/services bills by endorsing the “coupon” to have it paid via our cesti vie trust (if I recall how it was explained)

Also a vid about endorsing estimated income tax payments and getting a return on the 1040 (there is another form too involved but I don’t recall)

I just struggle to connect all the dots as well as identify the process from a reliable source other than Joe in his mom’s basement 

 Yeah you really want to find the time to watch Brandon's Contract Killer 2.0 course. It is free. That would "connect the dots" better than anything else. Don't bother asking attorney-at-law because they don't have a fucking clue, or they wouldn't be working for a paycheck.

Taxes are braindead easy to pay with indorsed bills and/or a revocation of election. Again, you have to watch brandons videos if you want to understand.

"He who knows more pays less. He who knows less pays more." GL 

 PS I am in Florida 

 In that case, the cartels probably have their own "tax" that they charge 😒
nostr:nevent1qqsqwh4p5dahjld4688lwat9ldy5dnffys69akeat488963um7w2accpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygx6ee3mqrzzumsp05qd6xg2jv5rscqzlavhhpq7khherhj0rn5yjypsgqqqqqqs0u60rl 

 begging to the government to put a commercial garden or build a shop

there is already plenty of law and case law relating to neighbours suing for damages over your impeding their customary enjoyment of their own property, such as building a tall building next to low buildings, and such. it's really not necessary to have a government zoning bullshit, it just makes for an ugly, uniform, institutionalised vibe

zoning laws in most of the Balkans are extremely lax if any at all... most of the commieblocks have shops at the bottom floor, or workshops or garages... people set up shops wherever. there is no laws against you laying out a bunch of stock to sell on the side of the road even, anywhere, no permission required so long as you aren't blocking traffic 

 Have you been to or lived in Houston? This is just a snippet. 

https://m.primal.net/LsiJ.jpg
https://m.primal.net/LsiK.png
 

 something to do with the sex shop?

i don't see what's weird about the picture on the right, looks like many highways i've been on in my life 

 yes, i was trying to remember what it reminded me of... outer suburbs of Budapest 

 Okay, pretty obvious you've never been to Houston. You'd understand the vast difference.