Oddbean

Artists and creators are the most obvious demographic of normie users that want to maintain control of their own data, content, money, and follower lists. It’s why #nostr makes so much sense for creators, and why I believe they should be high priority end users for devs considering the way nostr apps are built. nostr:note1e4ue6weex643dkatk944ehhcxcs9qasdul3r4r9ug9ryn8327ycsz4psrg

No, they just want a way to sell their work. They’re on those platforms because there’s a feedback loop saying they need to be on that platform or else get a proper job. Proper jobs suck. V4V could really help a lot of us out. I don’t want to advertise Grammarly.

I also have heard repeatedly that a lot of artists trying to get signed to a label won’t be considered unless they already have an established following online. They have no choice but to play the influencer game if they want to even have a chance.

V4V is not a model that allows anyone but the top of the top elite to make a living, and even that top of the top would be able to make orders of magnitude more otherwise. Nostr can help content creators connect with consumers and get paid directly, but you still need a pricing mechanism that isn't one-sided like V4V is. The only way you can sell something is if you own it. That is, if you control the access to it. I think paywalls (zapwalls?) do exist on Nostr right?

You can control access to your community, to your merch, to your concerts. But you cannot control to access your content on an open protocol. Here #V4V is your only option. Nostr is great for all of it. #V4V, Interoperable Communities you own, Marketing merch etc...

The key I think is to approach v4v as one of many revenue streams. The other key is that you still have to create something that people love. Professional artists are small businesses, and have to approach themselves as such. Revenue can include many sources, such as ticket sales to live events, merch/album sales, V4V and more. Where/when V4V makes sense, it should be used. When it doesn’t, other approaches should be used. Nostr and bitcoin allow you instant global potential reach, but it doesn’t negate the need to put in the work and build your community and create stuff that people love.

Absolutely true. The world for young musicians is very different to the one I came up in. Also most musicians I know hate the promo side of stuff, it can feel very icky, it’s not typically what they’re good at, especially when trying to compete with people with teams making content. If Nostr can help create a world where folks can concentrate on making good music and not selling socks then I’m here for it!

hosting their own image files is important too (instead of using an apps built-in image upload service), in order to control image metadata, etc. ..this also makes linked image files more portable across existing and future services/platforms

Ahh yes because artists care about cryptography… oh wait, they don’t. Freedom fighters do. Artists care about content monetization, so they don’t have to work a day job — but that’s only possible if there’s a huge userbase. Huge userbases with Zaps lead to amazing content monetization possibilities.

He and made a promise and we will keep it. Together or separate. It’s not JD I fell in love with … not in any traditional sense currently known He knows that. Even if no one yet knows Our code shows it Always has

There is quite a bit of nuance in my posts above if you cared to actually read them. Zaps will work for more people and more types of content at scale, but they are already providing better opportunities for artists than the traditional/legacy platforms, many of which require enormous followings and numbers of streams before an artist can even begin to monetize. Nostr and zaps allow artists to immediately begin monetizing with their audience at any level or size of following. @Ainsley and @Joe Martin 🎶🟠⚡ are two artists already doing this and sharing info about their experience here vs. traditional platforms. Here are a couple of their posts mentioning it screenshotted below. Look at apps like Wavlake, Fountain, and Stacker News. These are apps optimizing for content monetization with zaps, they are integrating nostr, and they are immensely popular with active user bases and are perhaps the most polished of all nostr apps/clients. This is what brings more users in. The censorship-resistance is a great benefit, but it’s not going to be the primary draw for most new users. https://image.nostr.build/e41cbc248e28e294b03417af7c51217efad9a816cc61b69299726e9f2007359f.jpg https://image.nostr.build/ef16716cefeaa968bd06fe98ae652091948fbef2b4f67155bd020e84289cfe6c.jpg

Nice testimonials… they’re only proving my original point. Not saying zaps won’t attract some people now, but they aren’t a serious alternative to ads until Nostr has more users. It’s a chicken or the egg situation. I’m bullish either way. nostr:note1ruxpllltn8esugg9l3ukexr2tljegl22csfrsk5a6qsz2hmtxn7qpx5rwd

100% It needs to make sense for artists and creators, they will then bring their communities/fans. Fans usually go where their favorite artists go. MySpace > iTunes > Spotify How can we get more artists in here? It’s top priority for me. I think @wavlake and @fountain_app are parts of this puzzle

Where's "here" though? The "social media" apps like Coracle (the client I'm using right noon desktop), Nostur, Damus, Amethyst, etc? Artists and creators could be on Nostr via Wavlake, Zapstream, etc., and not "here".

really good... that the developer focuses on the creator/artist... would it be a 3.0 manager? muy bueno la verdad... q el desarrollador se enfoque en el creador/artista... sería un manager 3.0? #hispano #español #dev #artist