Oddbean new post about | logout
 I don't think that's really true. I think it's more of a one man crusade. It's Andrews Army :)

I find #Gab the most irritating of all the #socialnetworks because they're the biggest hypocrites.

They spout #freespeech  slogans and then they ban people for linking to #Mastodon and blaspheming.

I didn't quite believe these claims myself, but I tested it and my account was suspended. They don't want free speech. They want Andrew's law. 
 gab and @a is quite clear they are building a Christian parallel.  Freedom under law, like the original us of a.  You certainly don't get to just say anything back when 1a was written lol 
 There is only one definition of free speech. You can say what you like. If you can't blaspheme you don't have freedom. It's that simple. 

You can't speak freely until you can think freely and you can't think freely if you're told what to think. What Gab offers is the same thing Xi offers China. My way or the highway. That's a dictatorship.

Saying you believe in free speech and then telling people what they can say is hypocrisy.

More importantly, while Andrew controls Gab he can control what people say. Relying on his indulgence is not real freedom. It's the freedom of a surf.

If he said this is Christian network where we indoctrinate people in the one true religion, I'd have no issue with him. It's the lies that irritate me. 
 there is not only one definition of free speech 
 Can you give me another that works for every side of every debate? 
 i.e. not hypocracy. just not what folks first think of when they think free speech.

still a honeypot