42 is 40 + 2 opcodes (which are counted in the current versions) If you think Core gets to just dictate things, get over your centralization mindset. Knots has used 40/42 since 2013. Samourai are the ones who chose to exceed it.
👍👏🧡😊
Seems this is not a mistake, @jack 😬
luke makes up standards no one e knows, then claims everyone else has it wrong https://image.nostr.build/484fac8be753054fd93c0299c71677cc43fa2873f4de3903960a5e66fcf115ab.jpg https://image.nostr.build/99800bb4111d8b26ffeac2ea6c7a90a9713021ae9a5444eafdca56a3948535e3.jpg
Recognizes core as credible originator of a standard but not a credible updater of said standard 🤔
More custom node rules will come up, some aligned with business requirements and/or idiology. I think it's fine, thats what decentralization and consensus is about. nostr:note13uuza6wxv5wukq0uclx30geg9au4nzayq9dhj7c8y3cvfjqfnvwqav970d
I mean yeah, but in the end it won't be an issue if it wasn't affecting the limited capacity Bitcoin users have to generate private transactions using something like whirlpool.
I wouldn't be surprised if In a few years to run a node you would choose between Core/ Ocean/Synonym node versions. nostr:note1rnpulvz9hstd8r7a7hfy7v7uh8arnr7yr5mq6vq9cy0em20dsdxqjw5py9