Oddbean new post about | logout
 "v0.10.0 had 40 (not 42) and isn't even available due to security concerns
your custom knots are basically the only ones running 42"
also if core says 80 and samourai works with 80 why are they the ones not complying, if only you are using 42? 
 42 is 40 + 2 opcodes (which are counted in the current versions)

If you think Core gets to just dictate things, get over your centralization mindset.

Knots has used 40/42 since 2013. Samourai are the ones who chose to exceed it. 
 👍👏🧡😊 
 Seems this is not a mistake, @jack 😬 
 luke makes up standards no one e knows, then claims everyone else has it wrong https://image.nostr.build/484fac8be753054fd93c0299c71677cc43fa2873f4de3903960a5e66fcf115ab.jpg https://image.nostr.build/99800bb4111d8b26ffeac2ea6c7a90a9713021ae9a5444eafdca56a3948535e3.jpg  
 Recognizes core as credible originator of a standard but not a credible updater of said standard 🤔 
 it is all so tiresome

i can’t believe how many clowns are defending this 
 More custom node rules will come up, some aligned with business requirements and/or idiology. I think it's fine, thats what decentralization and consensus is about. 

nostr:note13uuza6wxv5wukq0uclx30geg9au4nzayq9dhj7c8y3cvfjqfnvwqav970d 
 I mean yeah, but in the end it won't be an issue if it wasn't affecting the limited capacity Bitcoin users have to generate private transactions using something like whirlpool. 
 Don't know if affects too much, other miners mine those txs, that's what bitcoin solves, if someone tries to censor somehow someone will eventually mine it. 
 I wouldn't be surprised if In a few years to run a node you would choose between Core/ Ocean/Synonym  node versions. 

nostr:note1rnpulvz9hstd8r7a7hfy7v7uh8arnr7yr5mq6vq9cy0em20dsdxqjw5py9