Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
Ronin | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 I think it's good to have other choices for nodes, each node runner can choose or even make his own version. I think bitcoin community should embrace this more even for fork consensus. About the topic, I don't think smaller blocks are viable, but again each node can vote with his node.
▲ ▼
captjack | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 yes - so long they are compatible MAIN PROTOCOL - will work - at the end - MAJORITY CONSENSUS WINs - dnot what me or you say or our view - one thing not everyone too technical so long DEVs Luke or others offer tech code + option - noob node runner CHOOSE !!! the majority
▲ ▼
Ronin | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 More custom node rules will come up, some aligned with business requirements and/or idiology. I think it's fine, thats what decentralization and consensus is about. 

nostr:note13uuza6wxv5wukq0uclx30geg9au4nzayq9dhj7c8y3cvfjqfnvwqav970d
▲ ▼
0xD43m0n | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 I mean yeah, but in the end it won't be an issue if it wasn't affecting the limited capacity Bitcoin users have to generate private transactions using something like whirlpool.
▲ ▼
Ronin | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Don't know if affects too much, other miners mine those txs, that's what bitcoin solves, if someone tries to censor somehow someone will eventually mine it.
▲ ▼
Ronin | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Don't know if affects too much, other miners mine those txs, that's what bitcoin solves, if someone tries to censor somehow someone will eventually mine it.