Oddbean new post about | logout
 https://youtu.be/lABvt4l0S3Y?si=f_vSzf8QIcJCEPfS 
 So, you're saying there were sub-species of humans that evolved very separately or in isolation from each other. Some mixing occurred in Africa, but it wasn't a fundamental change. We are still quite separate from each other, but it doesn't deny evolution as a whole. 

Am I understanding it correctly? 
 This sounds like this documentary on Netflix. https://m.imdb.com/title/tt27837467/

A small graveyard of human like bones found but they aren’t actually from our line of evolution, suggesting a related but different species that took a different evolutionary path. 
 There is a basic consensus in the scientific community that there were other species close to humans, such as Neanderthals and Denisovans. It's generally understood that these species went extinct, with little bit of mixing but this video suggests we still have sub-sub-species, who evolved separately, which contradicts mainstream evolutionary biology beliefs.

Btw thanks for suggestion I like these kind of documentary. I will definitely watch it. 
 Maybe watch the video then you better understand the point 
 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lABvt4l0S3Y 
 I watched half of the video, and to be honest, I don't know much about this particular topic. However, I'm aware that politics significantly influences evolutionary biology. It's quite interesting, and I plan to learn more about it. 
 whoops i didnt know it was the same video I was posting... 
 mebe this can assist:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6013398-erectus-walks-amongst-us 
 not an endorsement, its just quite data heavy so perhaps a good source...