I have appreciated your past videos.
However, this one, is very toxic in how men and women relate. It almost has a very Epi-Disgenics propaganda. It is a very dark video.
First, our build-in nature is one of relatedness -- to share our deep emotions with safe people. This is most important in our romantic relationships. Psychological and Psychoanalytic research over the past several decades goes against what you are saying. Please check out the research of Dr. Ed Tronick, Dr. John Bowlby, Dr. Susan Johnson, Melanie Klein, Mary Ainsworth, Francis Tustin, Dr. James Gooch, Dr. John Gotttman. Dr. Wilford Bion and Dr. Robert Stolorow to name a few.
Second we are a programmable species. The dark occult's agents is to set a divide between the sexes. And to say that a women's nature is to only think about safety and resource for her and her babies is simply not true for the Stellar Woman. The non-Stellar Woman is in a FEAR mindset and she is stuck in the religion of Mon-eye. This is dark occult programming.
This is not men or women's true nature. We are abundance and we can create whatever we want as we are powerful LOVE Beings.
Third, both sexes need to take responsibility for their own protection. This is not passed on to one or the other.
Now, to your point, there may be many women who think as you are saying, but that again is not their nature as I argued above.
If men and women begin to act to what you are saying in this video, that would continue a very very dark path for men and women.
That is a valid point, although there are some terms that are a bit cryptic, like 'Epi-Disgenics' or 'Stellar Woman'.
If I may add to my previous comment here, I particularly resonated with the idea that women seem to ask 'how we feel' but are also afraid to find out their men can be weak. This was the cause of my marriage's decline. Women prefer strong, leading men.
The original message from Cahlen might help men avoid falling into this trap. This should be encouraged.
The term Stellar comes from the Book "Stellar Man."
The term "Epi-Disgenics" comes from Mark Passio's excellent work on Neo-Feminism.
Also, vulnerability is NOT weakness! This is the problem that the two are some how conflated. Vulnerability is actually strength.
Thank you for that clarification,
I will look into it
I'm sorry about your marriage.
this subject is something I'm really interested in, and I have a lot to say about my own experiences, so if you want to talk more about feelings and vulnerability I'll be very glad to write more.
it is not easy to face anyone's vulnerability and it's true we are not used to seeing men being vulnerable. and when we face that it's frightening, cause we grew up believing that man we trust would protect us from harm - and this illusion comes with the belief that feeling sadness ou fear, for exemple, is not safe and makes men week.
but to really built a relationship in which both of us can be ourselves, I must allow myself to feel the fear, the insecurities that come when I see my husband being human and feeling all that comes for him to feel. and when I allow myself to feel that, I can truly embrace his feelings and we can support each other.
I started paying attention to this in my life at least seven years ago. in 2017 I wrote something about not feeling fully in charge of my safety when I was with my boyfriend (now husband) and the extra weight he felt like he needed to carry when I just left it up to him. he is very honest and his honesty inspired me to be honest with myself and that was the space I needed to be aware of myself, to really open myself up for feeling whatever comes.
as anyone, we sometimes fear vulnerability, but when we realize that, we can rest and be vulnerable and face our true feelings so they can go and bring fresh air to both of us. as time passes we are more intimate and supportive.
I am open to listen to everyone's feelings. that's really the thing I find most interesting in life, maybe. I'm here if any of you want to talk.
Thanks for the kind words, the results of this whole experience for me was to brush it off, and never shown anythings to anyone afterwards.
yes. it is a valid response for the pain and confusion you must have felt. we didn't learn in childhood that we could feel whatever came (it's not anyone's fault, they also didn't know), they punished us or distracted us, or told us somehow that our feelings were wrong. so when someone tells us we can say what we are feeling and the person can't embrace it all at the time we feel again like we are doing something wrong just for feeling. but you were not and you are not. if you feel like, start observing what feelings you don't allow yourself to feel, you answered me yesterday about feelings and related that to our body, and that's how I embrace my feelings, observing my body. I think the more we allow ourselves to feel, more open we are to share that with people when we feel like doing.
good morning!
I think you're conflating the 'is' & the 'ought'.
We ought not to be subject to our bodies whims & fears, but most still are.
When one finds Truth, awakening from a long slumber, we are confronted by a realisation that we cannot simply awaken others. Even those that seem awake still nap frequently as various triggers arise. We must walk with this Truth in the hope that others will awaken of their own accord.
What Cahlen is talking about is returning to a more natural human dynamic where the divine feminine is allowed to express itself through women. We have denied this divine feminine expression by placing a burden on women that they were never meant to carry.
The psyop was first feminising men which led to the masculinising of women & the suppression of the divine feminine.
He's talking about men needing to pick the burden back up, to restore the support of the brotherhood & free women so that they can express the love that they so badly want to express.
Fear is the tool of darkness.
Oddbean new post about login | logout 