@ab7cf35b @02ecde16
imho: Scientific models are a bit different than ML models -- they are closer to generator programs than to classifiers or function approximators.
If theories are closer to programs, they are better defined by Kolmogorov complexity; classifiers and function approximators are better defined (as mentioned) by VC dimension or Rademacher complexity...
Theories also call each other recursively, like Maxwell's equations; another reason to consider them 'programs'.
@5ff7031a @ab7cf35b
I completely agree with this!
It was just an exercise to check my own sanity as well as see if others think in similar ways, vis-a-vis ML/NN systems will discover physical laws and all that nonsense.