OK, so, did you build relationships by pointing a gun at their head and saying "we need to get along or else?" No.

Nope. Dumb travel interferences, subsidization leading to less competition meaning higher costs and lower quality service, dealing with idiotoc and capricious tarrifs, limitations on transporting currency, the threat of federal prison for various non-violent "offenses," etc. That's not worth dealing with. Though, I don't mind a check when crossing boarders to another country. 

Yup. And it would suck, but I'd survive. Or not. Then it's not my worry anymore. I'd still rather not have da gubment involved.  

 None of what you just said is an argument against taxes. It’s all critiques of the government, how big it is, and what it’s doing. And that’s all valid. And, as a minarchist, I probably agree with you on a ton of that stuff. But you can critique all of that and still argue in favor of taxes. 

 Can you explain to me how taxation isn't coerced? Specifically in my case, where I do so not wish to pay taxes? 

Also: why coercively tax people? There are other ways to find things that don't require coercion. There was no income tax in the US until the Civil War, then it was repealed until 1913. 

I have never once agreed to any of this. Don't you dare claim that by participating in giving my permission. You don't ask the rape victim the same question because that's disgusting. Taxation is just as disgusting to me.  

 I feel like I have provided plenty of arguments against these points, but let’s try it a different way. 

Can you name for me a good or service that are you are willing to pay for? 

 No, you have not. You haven't addressed the moral implication of the state and taxes. You still wish to put a gun to my head to ensure that you get what you think is right and proper, and that cannot be either. 

Food, at least until I have my own land and can produce most of my own.  

 What I found interesting about the book is how super violent communities lived right next door to peaceful ones, both obviously choosing to live the opposite of what they saw next door and becoming more and more extreme in their opposition to the other. I think it has something to say about human nature and modern politics. 

 Unpopular opinion: this generation is too free with too many options created by free time due to technical advances. 

If I had to defend my position I would begin with personal experience. I often experience too many options as paralising. The lack of constraints on how I live and who I listen to as an authority is a difficult responsibility to bear. If I had to just get on with making my community a better place and spend more time in the home cooking and cleaning and less time pondering the possibilities it could be easier 🤷🏽‍♀️. I guess I just admitted to understanding why people feel they need the state to decide their morals for them. 

And for an example of how it is bad for society: Kids these days have time to wander whether or not they are the gender of their biological reality. They should be learning how to survive but instead confusion is being pushed on them in order to give them mental illnesses and make them easier to control... The people who come up with the lies should be working constructively to improve their own lot and that of their family and community rather than making this sh*t up and teaching it to children and adults through inclusion programs.  

 Personally, I think you're spot on. 👍👏 

 Who? I can’t tell who anyone is replying to anymore 😂 

 Lol. Sorry, I was talking to @Nobody. 

 I agree - too many inputs (constant datastream) while, especially for boys, there are too few "accepted" outputs to behavior and energy. 

 Just give them amphetamines, you heathen!  

 Drug them and make them more feminine... Like that's gonna help 🤷🏽‍♀️

Let boys be boys.