Fundamentally we should not rely on "founders with power to push back". Consider what happens when they fail at doing so. Or just don't feel like pushing back. nostr:note1faymrczpf475gr96fxwazspk9h0us9dkfjejvn554ytrwl43lp4q5qg07m
Or pull a Hanlon's Razor. Power always blinds and corrupts.
this: it's always a temporary situation when it hinges on one person, or a certain culture among those in charge, we've seen it so many times that that just won't stay in a business there will always be reversion to the mean: mostly likely, the next CEO will only be concerned with profits, any activism will get demoted to marketing slogan (even ignoring that Musk's "freedom of speech" is very one-sided and fragile, he was censoring the word "cisgender" side-wide just shortly ago ffs)
Eliminate all single points of failure such as "founders with power to push back"
Just to clarify to any spooks reading alongs: I'm not in favor of eliminating founders :-)
Not existing ones 🤣 the goal is to not create new ones whenever possible
A founder who pushed back: nostr:note1lg7xrxlrsr9rs2wajpvzmwsytdllanlhr2nmu3jguttkpg3jvqls3en47j