Probably 🤣 nothing new 🥲🤣🙃 

 This is due to how Damus/Primal handles NIP-10 and nostr:reference
The Daniel's note in question has 3 different mentions/references

** Embedded note that Daniel wanted to mention (this uses nostr: format)

nostr:nevent1qqsr7hj00rtm00h8uyvhs0jfvzy2zeh5fdktn9c73rhzlwthp95tj5cpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyrhxagf6h8l9cjngatumrg60uq22v66qz979pm32v985ek54ndh8gqcyqqqqqqgd2l60l

**Onyx's note to which The Daniel replied 
(This is in NIP-10 format with "reply" marker)

nostr:nevent1qqs94afkfchld4zc9hkaenttdwnaaf8z6qvywnqu28879seds49xqjcmntm6u

** The Daniel's original note "Never forget..." to which Onyx replied (This is in NIP-10 format with "root" marker)

nostr:nevent1qqswgsj7s2vfkhkj8ejhy4tzc633cj3fvmf8f3zy2hlqx3z6ulpuy4gpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyrhxagf6h8l9cjngatumrg60uq22v66qz979pm32v985ek54ndh8gqcyqqqqqqgvzxrmj

I am not sure why the nostr: embedded reference was ignored by Damus & "root" note is shown instead. 
Maybe it's because the quote format is different in Damus -- it's uses a "q" tag instead of "e" tag 🤷‍♀️
 I am not even sure what you're seeing in this post of mine as I am adding Amethyst too to the mix now 😅😅 

 Thank you @சாரு-秋陽

Yeah NIP-10 is a bit janky, and the devs dont have a test suite as of today. Hence why results differ.

Bookmarked for #nostrability analysis. 

 I think we have a bug, I experienced this recently as well. 

 It displays correctly on Damus but Primal is not showing the right quoted note, and the one that should be there can’t be found at all with Primal.