Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
The: Daniel⚡️ | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 One of my notes from last week never appeared on Primal and I still can’t figure it out.
nostr:note18a0y77xhk7lw0cge0qlyjcyg59n0gjmvhxt3az8w97uhwztgh9fsyqsru9
▲ ▼
𝓞𝓷𝔂𝔁.𝓥𝓲𝔁𝓮𝓷 | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +2 
 Bizarre. 

I know I had complaints / jokes about possibly breaking one of the clients temporarily when I posted. I also know a lot don’t appreciate or want my content on their relay or on nostr in general. 😂🥲 

But yours sir , makes no sense as to why yours didn’t go through. 🤔💭
▲ ▼
PurpleHorse ⚡️ | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 We’re being censored. I knew it 🤓👀😅
▲ ▼
𝓞𝓷𝔂𝔁.𝓥𝓲𝔁𝓮𝓷 | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Probably 🤣 nothing new 🥲🤣🙃
▲ ▼
Rand | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 those darn nips & bips!      ffs
▲ ▼
sersleepy | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @primal is showing a different note

And @damus shows a different one too https://i.nostr.build/HrNVvrQwD95ePKTT.png
▲ ▼
sersleepy | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +2 
 @elsat @jb55 I didn’t know notes could be different between clients
▲ ▼
சாரு-秋陽 | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 This is due to how Damus/Primal handles NIP-10 and nostr:reference
The Daniel's note in question has 3 different mentions/references

** Embedded note that Daniel wanted to mention (this uses nostr: format)

nostr:nevent1qqsr7hj00rtm00h8uyvhs0jfvzy2zeh5fdktn9c73rhzlwthp95tj5cpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyrhxagf6h8l9cjngatumrg60uq22v66qz979pm32v985ek54ndh8gqcyqqqqqqgd2l60l

**Onyx's note to which The Daniel replied 
(This is in NIP-10 format with "reply" marker)

nostr:nevent1qqs94afkfchld4zc9hkaenttdwnaaf8z6qvywnqu28879seds49xqjcmntm6u

** The Daniel's original note "Never forget..." to which Onyx replied (This is in NIP-10 format with "root" marker)

nostr:nevent1qqswgsj7s2vfkhkj8ejhy4tzc633cj3fvmf8f3zy2hlqx3z6ulpuy4gpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyrhxagf6h8l9cjngatumrg60uq22v66qz979pm32v985ek54ndh8gqcyqqqqqqgvzxrmj

I am not sure why the nostr: embedded reference was ignored by Damus & "root" note is shown instead. 
Maybe it's because the quote format is different in Damus -- it's uses a "q" tag instead of "e" tag 🤷‍♀️
 I am not even sure what you're seeing in this post of mine as I am adding Amethyst too to the mix now 😅😅
▲ ▼
elsat | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Thank you @சாரு-秋陽

Yeah NIP-10 is a bit janky, and the devs dont have a test suite as of today. Hence why results differ.

Bookmarked for #nostrability analysis.
▲ ▼
jb55 | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +3 
 I think we have a bug, I experienced this recently as well.
▲ ▼
The: Daniel⚡️ | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 It displays correctly on Damus but Primal is not showing the right quoted note, and the one that should be there can’t be found at all with Primal.