Oddbean new post about login | logout THE SUITS ARE HERE AND THEY HAVE DIFFERENT VALUES THAN SOVEREIGN BITCOINERS.
No I got that part. but I don't understand how that means "we won't have a softfork that's even remotely contentious"
sorry Matt reading comprehension problems here. now I don't understand why you think we can't possibly get an even *slightly* contentious softfork, but you think a hard-fork is possible...? couldn't reconcile those two things and my brain farted. how do you square that circle?
A MINORITY CAN HARD FORK SAFELY WHILE A MINORITY SOFT FORK COULD BE QUITE DANGEROUS. ANYONE CAN HARD FORK WITHOUT PERMISSION AND IT IS OPT IN.
question whats are the dangers of a minority soft fork? i get theres additional complexity and the possibility of unintentional chain splits. but it still a minority right? so except for being unintentional and confusing for everyone (and implementation bugs security risks blah blah) what are the dangers? nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqpxfzhdwlm3cx9l6wdzyft8w8y9gy607tqgtyfq7tekaxs7lhmxfqqs9wstjls5w6nv22uvps2jfw5vm7nun32r2pman4qwerp03gpzetrq5qcsqt
Have you listen to his episode with nostr:nprofile1qqsw4v882mfjhq9u63j08kzyhqzqxqc8tgf740p4nxnk9jdv02u37ncpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9uju6mpd4czuumfw3jsz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsq3yamnwvaz7tmsw4e8qmr9wpskwtn9wvql3tqm and nostr:nprofile1qqswyru28qavtc2nvcgpc9sgae8n875t94uj2r8t9ddg4w4y899xulqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsaraccz on consensus?
No I don't think so. Was that a Dispatch?
Probably, it was only a couple weeks or less ago. Whatever Matt's show is.
I tuned out of Matt's show when it became all about LN and nostr development. I'll take a look, thanks.
Yeah, I don't have long historical reference for the show. I've just been tuning to a few episodes with attempts to try and understand different aspects and get a better whole systems view of this world, which small exposures to topics like the one I referenced help with.