Spammers need to pay like everyone else.  Bitcoin doesn't use white blood cells, or any cells, so it'll be fine. 

 There is no 'the mempool'.  Every node has its own mempool.  Spammers will pay to play like everyone else.   

 Check their open source and see if it contains any of Bitcoin's core code.  That'll tell you all you need to know. 

 Their Swift system is open to attacks, so I can't see them implementing cbdcs any more secure.  The digital Sand dollar is a cbdc which can still be exchanged for Bitcoin.  Personally, I'm not worried. 

 Faith is a human construct meant to soothe those who do not or can not trust others.  That is the whole point of Bitcoin.  Faith is not required.   

 Just block it and it'll go away. 

 You are arguing with a bot, which is dumb.  So block the bot and it goes away.  Is that more helpful?  You sound a little manic, so maybe you need more help than I can provide.   

 Nope.  I don't know who Jack is.  Bots learn from interaction with humans and arguing with one is as meaningless as talking to one.  Shit in the background, from a bot, is no different than white nosie.  White noise stems from cosmic background radiation, but I don't converse with the universe and neither does Jack,

You do you though.  Good luck. 

 Hope that was helpful for you.  You seem extremely intelligent and I wish you the best. 

 Bitcoin's usage has always been as private as the person using it.  And the censorship issues involve bitcoin knots which is not Bitcoin.  The Knot's datacarrier setting is filtering large transactions and can't tell the difference between coinjoins and ordinals.  Maybe read up on the issues before you say nonsensical things.  

Bitcoin is not being censored, and privacy is on the user. 

 It's a tale as old as time.  One side wants to use something for their purpose and another side wants to use something for its intended purpose.  Add another side and you get an eye on top of a pyramid.  I say let the rabbits wear glasses. 

 Nope. 

 Consolidating utxo's is more akin to moving cash from old physical wallets to a new wallet.  Or taking change (coins) to coinstar to get paper money and then putting it in a physical wallet.  

It sounds weird because typically no one carries multiple wallets on their person but change (coins) require a centralized service to convert back into paper.  Bitcoin doesn't need a third party to accomplish this, 

 That comes from an SNL celebrity jeopardy joke.   

 Birth, bitcoin gave me the tools to age. 

 That sweet pink smoke.  Perfection. 

 Boycott and bring back the 2 for 5 sausage McMuffin.  With our powers combined we can be full until lunchtime. 

 Some fight harder with votes some fight harder with code.  We should probably call each other but I hate talking on the phone. 

 I don't even know what that is, but thank you for your service. 

 That looks good.  Good cook. 

 If you can bite through the skin without pulling it all off, it'll taste like bacon.  And that looks like bacon, even though it's chicken. 

 Those could be Dick's.  You never will know. 

 Sounds like a long way of saying, acting.   

 Pretty sure people said the same about bitcoin.  Leaders create great things and walk away.  Followers try to fix it. 

 That will never get to be an actual pothole.   

 I don't believe you. 

 But don't forget, some find it more than worthwhile to steal what you worked so hard for.  I've been in circles where that is considered the smart way of doing business.   

 Not my first or my last.  No one is perfect.