You have no idea what you're talking about. The "program" you download is a compiled binary, not the source code, and anyway, source files take up very little "memory".
Agnostics are atheists. It's the same thing. In theory, there is such a thing as a "gnostic atheist", but I've never actually encountered one. It's basically a unicorn.
This is all fairly uneducated with regard to atheism. I suggest you YouTube Christopher Hitchens. He addressed your arguments much better than I ever could.
Where did I say I'm uneducated? I've been thinking and reading about this matter for decades.
Of course, if you're unconvinced by Hitchens's arguments (or unwilling to hear them), then this discussion is pointless.
I simply deferred to a much better debater, someone who has addressed all of your points directly. How you think that makes me uneducated is a mystery.
And the point of life is for it to go on. That's evolution, my guy! We are here because we survived. It's not that complicated. What's "silly" is thinking you need a god to explain what science has already gotten right.
Weed is legal where I live, and literally the only changes are that it's now far cheaper and safer to get, and we're getting billions in tax revenue. That's it, no social changes. I don't see any causal relationship to the other problems you describe. You seem to be making a gateway-drug argument.
Notes by e156f44a | export