"Die westlichen Strategen wissen, dass Russland nicht die Absicht hat, Europa anzugreifen, aber das Schreckgespenst eines aggressiven Russlands „vor den Toren Europas“ ist sehr wichtig für den Aufbau einer neuen Realität im Westen, ähnlich wie die Fantasien beziehungsweise Prophezeiungen von George Orwell. Alle dachten, er beschreibe Stalins Sowjetunion, aber er blickte hundert Jahre in die Zukunft des Westens."
„Einen Weltkrieg mit Atomwaffen unter allen Umständen verhindern!“ – Exlusiv-Interview mit Dmitri Trenin
Dmitri Trenin ist wissenschaftlicher Direktor am Institut für Militärwirtschaft und Strategie der Nationalen Forschungsuniversität Higher School of Economics in Moskau und ein führender Forscher am IMEMO, dem Institut für Weltwirtschaft und Internationale Beziehungen der Russischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
It is always exciting to read the Bitcoin Optech Newsletters.
Anyone who is interested in what happens under the hood of Bitcoin Core can do so, even if they only understand 5% of it; it still makes sense.
This lady Caitlin is so brave and tenacious, she's taking on this bunch of FDIC and FED flat-nose pliers and will succeed in the end, simply because she's on the right side of history.
why is the key (only) on keybase ?
"Keybase is no longer maintained. The project was officially shut down on September 29, 2021, as announced by its creators.”
keybase sucks
great episode
absolutely worth the time
nostr:nprofile1qqsr7acdvhf6we9fch94qwhpy0nza36e3tgrtkpku25ppuu80f69kfqpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmnt9uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7eyerqr is a great ambassador representing nostr to folks
" In a time where our voice is being silenced, our critical thinking is labeled and ridiculed, our minds controlled through sophisticated propaganda, and the state and globalist powers continue to clamp down on our innate rights, ..."
bravo
good to have you on nostr
Do it! Just do it.
thank nostr:nprofile1qqsr9cvzwc652r4m83d86ykplrnm9dg5gwdvzzn8ameanlvut35wy3gpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqprfmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdaksz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcgek0h3 nostr:nprofile1qqsrhuxx8l9ex335q7he0f09aej04zpazpl0ne2cgukyawd24mayt8gprfmhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwve5kzar2v9nzucm0d5hszxmhwden5te0wfjkccte9emk2um5v4exucn5vvhxxmmd9us2xuyp nostr:nprofile1qqswnep8vjgrwjsd4am4nl2lgaw7lahlhxc0chaf3jgzkh6t9l3mhgspzdmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ue0xtwjp9 and Co. later
Rune, looking up for your thoughts.
One thing; I have seen this argument ("
First, history demonstrates that you don't need many people to change society for the better.") often and in fact I like it on first glance.
But.
It's mostly about violent change, one or the other way.
What one could ask is: if our stateship / political system was mostly given birth via a Constituent Assembly, it needed more than a few people.
So, if it's done peacefully and in due process you will need more than a few.
And, yes, it's naive to expect anything from the masses. And, yes the freerider 40% are a real problem for any progress. They will "defect" when they have nothing left to lose.
Again, what's needed on the societal layer is a "sly, roundabout way".
In this context, it occurs to me that I find the French word avant-garde very well fitting.
The goal must be a political system that is flat and decentralized in its structures, but at the same time defensible, based on a new money. The big question is how the transition should be structured. If it is not planned, there is the old danger: old wine in new bottles, or the (old) wolf in sheep's clothing. no gain
very curious how and when all this will play out
could we please develop an AI supported proper name pronunciation APP for all the particularly linguistically gifted podcasters of this world (i.e. only for nostr:nprofile1qqsywt6ypu57lxtwj2scdwxnyrl3sry9typcstje65x7rw9a2e5nq8sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqydhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnzd96xxmmfdecxzunt9e3k7mgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mq9hxafw) that completely deletes and replaces his pronunciation from the audio track?!
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by zoomoutpls | export
Rune, looking up for your thoughts. One thing; I have seen this argument (" First, history demonstrates that you don't need many people to change society for the better.") often and in fact I like it on first glance. But. It's mostly about violent change, one or the other way. What one could ask is: if our stateship / political system was mostly given birth via a Constituent Assembly, it needed more than a few people. So, if it's done peacefully and in due process you will need more than a few. And, yes, it's naive to expect anything from the masses. And, yes the freerider 40% are a real problem for any progress. They will "defect" when they have nothing left to lose. Again, what's needed on the societal layer is a "sly, roundabout way".