Oddbean new post about | logout

Notes by b81aec0f | export

 AirBNB filed a petition for Cancellation at TTAB to cancel 420BNB (ESTTA1314278).  Imagine being a company founded in 2008 and thinking you own the term BNB? 
 @e7f76f0d @b8e4a7a8 This is what I don't understand in these cases, both from these types of published opinions and my own experiences. If you point out a glaring problem to the Judge, why aren't they taking a moment to review the facts as to the other defendants as well? Like...do they really think it is one isolated mistake instead of the entire case is based on an intentional misrepresentation of trademark law? 
 If you’re going to file a very aggressive TM case accusing retailers of “counterfeiting,” you should make sure you’re not actually making claims against people selling authentic products from another brand with superior trademark rights in another category 🙃🙂🙃 
 @e7f76f0d This is my biggest pet peeve. When my clients have a dispute with a vendor, we send a demand letter. When my clients have a dispute with a contractor or designer, we send a demand letter. Every other aspect of business can be reasonably managed through traditional dispute resolution but for some reason you say the word counterfeit and suddenly you get different rules? GMAB. 
 @e7f76f0d And like, that's one of the big parts of being a business owner - deciding which fights are worth fighting. How much did I lose by this late delivery and does it justify my attorneys fees? Litigation can be kept rare and minimal when both sides are conscious of their fees and the costs in time and effort a full-throated dispute costs. When IP Plaintiffs get special rules, the balance is off and you lead to more, faster, and more aggressive litigation that is not always justified. 
 Do people make these kinds of arguments in other areas of the law? Do contracting parties argue i... 
 @e7f76f0d This is my biggest pet peeve. When my clients have a dispute with a vendor, we send a demand letter. When my clients have a dispute with a contractor or designer, we send a demand letter. Every other aspect of business can be reasonably managed through traditional dispute resolution but for some reason you say the word counterfeit and suddenly you get different rules? GMAB. 
 nostr:npub16pcnkuannwmpwmu9phqvyg93uavdgdmzgy8cfrzvk7swr98udfus6s8j5n That's an interesting quest... 
 @e7f76f0d Not yet unfortunately. I have seen a few attempts where the Judge denied the request as the D did not prove they “prevailed” versus settled. In most cases IMO it’s not a case of prevailed as it is that the restraint was completely disproportionate to the alleged harm. DP cases seem like a better candidate because it’s often easier to “prevail” if the products are different from the claims. Copyright is too wishywashy. 
 In the NDIL, Judge Tharp granted a seller's motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction in an Emoji Schedule A case finding the seller was likely to prevail showing its use of the word "emoji" was descriptive fair use. FINALLY!!! Emoji v. Schedule A, No. 1 22 cv 2378, Dkt. 107 (NDIL Sept. 29, 2023) 
 Note that Judge Tharp required a $250,000 bond in this case. Does a higher bond encourage defendants to appear and defend themselves as defense attorneys can hope to get paid when they prevail by making a claim against the bond? 
 From the Order, at 6: "Despite Emoji Company’s apparent confidence in the strength of its brand, the reality is that consumers looking to buy emoji-themed stickers are likely to search for the word “emoji.” This is not because they seek any Emoji-Company-branded products (licensed or otherwise).  Rather, it is simply because that is the best way to describe stickers using the iconic pictogram styles." 🙃 👀 😎 
 In two cases in NDGA, Judge Brown granted Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment but denied P's request of $25k in statutory damages and awarded only $2,000 per "counterfeit mark" per defendant in statutory damages.  The Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLC v. 1supply et al The Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLC v. 1supply et al, No. 1 22 cv 3415 (Oct. 2, 2023);  Moncler SpA v. a_bigbaby et al, No. 1 22 cv 4912 (Oct. 2, 2023). 
 Of course, this is calculated. The fight over who should pay for enforcement isn't new and those ... 
 @e7f76f0d I don’t understand this argument when Plaintiffs and the professional IP Plaintiff law firms are making millions of dollars a year from these lawsuits. Firms like VogtIP and GBC advertise how much they have collected. It’s a money-making enterprise! 
 @e7f76f0d I’ve defended dozens (if not over 100 by now) of people sued for selling counterfeit branded products or pirated art products and every one was an individual that didn’t understand the law and was using the very small amount of funds earned to support their families in very poor communities. 
 @e7f76f0d Like the most common defendant I see is a young (18-25) person working in an Internet cafe in Vietnam or Thailand dropshipping products from Alibaba to Amazon to save money to help their parents and move to the city for a job. We try to help them find legitimate sources or local artists to steer clear of infringement going forward. But DEFINITELY not terrorism or organized crime 
 @e7f76f0d I’ve defended dozens (if not over 100 by now) of people sued for selling counterfeit branded products or pirated art products and every one was an individual that didn’t understand the law and was using the very small amount of funds earned to support their families in very poor communities. 
 @e7f76f0d Interesting! Ashly Sands was sued personally for defamation for filing a false counterfeit complaint on behalf of a client on Amazon. Unfortunately her firm filed it against an Amazon seller that's a patent lawyer married to a patent lawyer. 
 I'll be listening in today to hear what nostr:npub1hrj2028dawlu4qtmuwe9q0fg3eer6ltdxs2l4n6ys475eg... 
 @e7f76f0d @b8e4a7a8  😂  I was just thinking the same thing, maybe he'll let us know when he's speaking because I'm not in the mood to vomit today. oh nooo my paw patrol tshirt made by slave labor, how dare they ***counterfeit*** it 
 nostr:npub16pcnkuannwmpwmu9phqvyg93uavdgdmzgy8cfrzvk7swr98udfus6s8j5n Good. I'm not sure from thi... 
 @e7f76f0d There were quite a few listed in the Complaint, including a how-to video showing how to make them at home. I do think it's good either way just to start putting some pressure on these over-zealous enforcement efforts! 
 New declaratory judgment action today against the Mossy Pole (D989,355) arguing the patent is invalid as there were many examples of earlier products that were not disclosed.  They're also seeking a retraction of the complaint filed with Amazon against Plaintiff's competing product. (Photo below is the design patent illustration compared to an earlier existing product)  Phan et al v. Simply Mossy Art Inc., No. 4-23-cv-04982  (NDCA Sept. 28, 2023).

https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/148/277/066/746/799/original/71123068472a322e.png 
 With the FTC chief maintaining a life-long grudge based on her law review note, I hope any law students working on Schedule A related law student notes carry the same vigor into a long career in intellectual property defense 😊 
 Trending? 2 of the 6 patent cases filed in district courts across the country yesterday were Schedule A Design Patent cases (according to Docket Report) 👀 
 @e7f76f0d I’m glad it went to a small business and it looks like the inventor and both examiners are all women 😊 
 @e7f76f0d @e4932863 @fe0ef525 Agreed. Plaintiffs can hire whoever they want as long as they are licensed, right? The Blue Sphere attorneys were sanctioned by Judge Seeger and they have been filing new cases every week. Plaintiffs don’t really care since they are not paying - it’s all on contingency. 
 @e7f76f0d my husband saw that and ran in to my office, “you cried all day when a court clerk asked you to center your page numbers and these guys get humiliated and sanctioned and they’re filing a new case the next day!!!” 😂😅 
 I'll admit I yelled "WHAT THE BLEEP" while looking at this design patent until I read that it was for a zippered shirt with a faux button placket and that's kind of cool as an accessible shirt (D775,457 S).  Davis v. Entities Listed on Exhibit 1, No. 1:23 cv 10799, (NDIL Sept. 13, 2023).

https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/063/207/087/294/943/original/43ac710f30165379.png 
 New flavor of Schedule A naming convention: Betty's Best v. The Facebook Advertisers Listed on Schedule A, No. 3:23 cv 4716 (NDCA Sept. 13, 2023). 
 It's not every day that you get to tell a Judge that someone is ignoring his very strong Order but today just might be my lucky day. 😂 
 The only thing better than the Order Prof. Burstein just posted is all the ridiculous comments from IP bootlickers basically arguing who cares if there's a lil fraud on the Court when someone is COPYING the idea for a novelty flag. Oh no, my precious clipart! Who will think of the clipart landlords? 
 nostr:npub16pcnkuannwmpwmu9phqvyg93uavdgdmzgy8cfrzvk7swr98udfus6s8j5n Good for you! Is your comme... 
 @e7f76f0d I didn't write a comment because I couldn't write one without getting myself in trouble. I did register to attend the "roundtable" though. Can't wait to hear about all these scary and dangerous tchotchkes that mildly resemble branded products 
 I don't think USPTO is going to accept my application to be a panelist advocating for the "counterfeiting is not a big problem, it's mostly anti-Chinese racism" perspective. https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/events/roundtable-future-strategies-anti-counterfeiting-and-anti-piracy?_hsmi=272689702 
Event not found
 @e7f76f0d @3fe52772 @998c8a33 I’ll add that it feels a lot more polite and  “professional” than other sites which makes it easier for me to keep my focus here. I always had a hard time on sites where I have both personal and professional contacts because I always felt like I was boring half the people I knew with whatever I was writing!