Ive been thinking about and reading/listening to a number of anarchist perspectives recently, especially perspectives on mutual aid and collective freedom.
It was a fun exercise chatting to GPT about anarchist criticisms and sympathies to the three options you offered.
Going back to my university where the Phil. department had a deep Ethics focus, I was struck then as I am now that the exercise of weighing up these approaches against eachother with the goal of choosing the best is at most a fun intellectual game. Life is too messy for a rigid dogmatic ethical preference system.
More importantly for me, Im deeply skeptical of how each of Deontology, Consequentialism & Utilirarianism, and Virtue Ethics allow space for political and social power structures to manipulate the rules, valued outcomes, and what counts as virtue in our society.
Through the lense of anarchism, this was fun to think about (with GPT as a socratic aid)
### 1. Deontology
- **Critique**: Anarchists typically critique deontology for its emphasis on absolute moral rules and potential to justify authoritarian structures.
- **Alignment**: However, certain aspects of deontological ethics, like the emphasis on principles and the intrinsic value of human beings (as seen in Kant's idea of treating individuals as ends in themselves, not merely as means), can resonate with anarchist values. Anarchists might appreciate the deontological stance against using people merely as tools for an end, aligning with their respect for individual autonomy and dignity.
### 2. Consequentialism
- **Critique**: Anarchists often criticize consequentialism for its potential to overlook individual rights in pursuit of a greater good, leading to authoritarian outcomes.
- **Alignment**: There is, however, potential sympathy in the idea that the outcomes of actions matter, especially in terms of promoting overall freedom and reducing suffering. Some anarchists might align with a form of consequentialism that prioritizes the dismantling of oppressive structures and the enhancement of collective well-being, provided it doesn't infringe on individual autonomy.
### 3. Virtue Ethics
- **Critique**: While anarchists are wary of how virtues are socially constructed and potentially reflective of hierarchical values, they are not entirely dismissive of virtue ethics.
- **Alignment**: Anarchists might find significant alignment with virtue ethics, particularly in its focus on personal moral development and integrity. They may advocate for virtues that foster individual autonomy, mutual aid, empathy, and resistance to unjust authority. This synergy is seen in the anarchist emphasis on building a new society within the shell of the old, through the cultivation of personal and communal virtues that challenge existing power structures.
--
So while each approach has a valuable perspective to offer, my primary concern would be ensuring that adopting any of these theories does not lead to frameworks for justifying authoritarianism and that the choice genuinely promotes mutual-aid as well as individual and collective freedom.
Perhaps the best conversation on the topic I've heard
nostr:nevent1qqs25shytmy4t3nf52ppkema02xmsr7hyar7w5d7ruyp2nl9fz6fj6gpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgsg86qcm7lve6jkkr64z4mt8lfe57jsu8vpty6r2qpk37sgtnxevjcrqsqqqqqpztc25j
Thanks for having doing these pods! The part at the end about Musk and Warren was so on point. As a non-US person with a business in the US, it is great that people like you two are representing a perspective I share!
Some shit needs resisting. This is that shit. Distopian future will happen if we allows it to.
nostr:nevent1qqspxq4wjde3g82fzdzpq0hnd2sx8eu9mg3n8kxpkft387kafx2fwkcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgrqsqqqqqpua6g8r
Dino news for the #plebchain. Or Dino news to enjoy with your morning cuppa for the #coffeechain.
For people that give a shit about dinosaur news!
https://m.primal.net/HNSx.mp4
I learned that traditional nuclear power plants generally need to run at constant output. Managing output changes poses challenges, and using #Bitcoin #mining to consume excess supply is a fascinating idea. Apparently newer designs are emerging for variable output though. Really interesting field!
I kinda like the received_at solution. Clients could alert users if the received_at varies wildly for different relays.
Timestamp consensus in a fully decentralized system seems like an interesting - but rabbit holesque - challenge! 😁
Another step in making #lightning adoptable by everyone. AMBOSS lightning the path ahead!
nostr:nevent1qqs0mgtr6m0yz69eprpz0487868c82rw8r4s74zaedhhchrz4hapw5cpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgsz4uq7p44arw0mh83agv2h6ezep7e8mnau403g0p99svhp00hms7crqsqqqqqp3rf3f3
I dont hate this as a starting point. Maybe you could set your sat-ad payment threshold. Something like "Ill see an ad, but only for 2k sats minimum"
A
There some interesting stuff in the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, Cambridge Judge Business School's article about the Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (CBECI)...
🔍 What's New?
The Center has recently updated its methodology for estimating Bitcoin's electricity consumption, introducing more precise metrics and assumptions. It looks like the changes aim to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the CBECI.
1️⃣ Past Estimates Revised: The updated methodology was applied retroactively, showing a significant adjustment in the 2021 figure from 104.0 TWh to 89.0 TWh, and a less pronounced but noteworthy difference in 2022 and 2023.
2️⃣ Efficiency Reassessed: The paper now takes into account the release dates and weights each considered mining hardware accordingly. The new estimates are better aligned with real-world efficiencies, hopefully improving the model's accuracy.
3️⃣ Future Outlook: The study acknowledges that Bitcoin's electricity consumption is elusive and depends on various factors, including geography and the type of energy sources used. Future research aims to provide a more nuanced view of Bitcoin's electricity mix.
====================
Some stuff that will probably cause (errr...) conversation 😁
📉 Significant Downward Revision of 2021 Electricity Consumption: From 104.0 TWh to 89.0 TWh.
🌍 Implications for Public Perception: Could be seen as softening Bitcoin's criticized environmental impact.
🏛️ Policy Impact: Could affect regulations and investment strategies related to Bitcoin's environmental sustainability.
====================
And some optimistic outlook as well! 😁
🌿 Potential Green Practices: Discusses mitigating methane emissions and other novel concepts like waste-heat recovery, which could make Bitcoin mining more sustainable.
🛠️ Model Improvement: Enhanced methodology to include weighting older, less efficient mining hardware differently, making the estimates more reliable.
🌐 ❓ Expansion Beyond Bitcoin: There are plans to augment the Cambridge Blockchain Network Sustainability Index with Ethereum's pre-Merge and post-Merge greenhouse gas emissions and cover more blockchain networks, indicating a more comprehensive look at the industry's environmental impact as a whole.
Perhaps a final point..?
🔁 Continuous Improvement: I know not everyone will agree, but Cambridge updating their model and data doesn't necessarily suggest that previous estimates were fundamentally flawed but rather, as with all academic work, it's a natural part of the ongoing process of refining and enhancing research. Personally I'd rather applaud the academic rigor and transparency shown.
Thanks to @BitcoinFriday for posting the article!
https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/2023/bitcoin-electricity-consumption/https://void.cat/d/NoziTR4LBFQ1UNUHYoGMSH.webp
Notes by Bryan | export