Oddbean new post about | logout
 @Cosmia ★ @a6642c96 I think a lot of these people just try to find something easy to blame stuff on, exactly the same way they choose to just blame us for "normalsing abuse" when CSA has always been a problem long before YAPs were even thought of as an oppressed population in the modern times. 
 You wonder why people associate normalizing pedophilia with transgender people. 
 @Eòlach @🖤 รςђเչ๏ ⚸🌙 what. You rlly just being transphobic rn?? 
 

https://media.crlf.ninja/8237e49501e115a349a8b6f077537a82383fe1827d9571e804b7c77843633f20.png 
 @Eòlach you arent an aryan gigachad, you're annoying to be around and make anti-lolicons look retarded 
 Don't need to make it look retarded when it is. Doesn't matter whether it is a fictional illustration, it's still a portrayal of sexual abuse by putting minors in compromising scenarios. The acceptance of this may embolden people to actually engage in said activity themselves. 
 >make anti-pedophiles look retarded
Uh
Nigger? What the fuck?? 
 I know @Nate Higgers, Head of Trust and Safety :rh_1::rh_4..., I know.

@Cosmia ★ 
 I bet he's not even a grill, I bet he's a pozzed tranny that got his dick chopped off 
 @a6642c96 is at least, can't speak for @Loded-Diaper. Pretty sure they were trying to play Devil's Advocate only to appear as if they're defending someone who is either a MAP or thinks Lolicon is fine for whatever reason. 

They were trying to appeal to my sense of morality by pointing out that I was mistreating an abuse victim by challenging them on their position but I didn't buy it. 
 @Eòlach @a6642c96 @Nate Higgers, Head of Trust and Safety :rh_1::rh_4... Literally all i argued is that there are better ways to get your point across. They weren't even talking about lolicon, they were venting about how their abuse was treated a joke because of their sex. The way you treated them speaks louder then the point being made. Your not stopping predators and your targeting victims.

https://5dollah.click/media/a37c05eb-2383-4dfd-ba18-d026c4a6d75a/image.png?name=image.png 
 Addressing why the illustration and distribution of lolicon is deeply immoral and something that should not be encouraged is to prevent the creation of further abusers by making substitute CSAM readily available. If they're going to say Lolicon is okay and then hide behind the fact they were abused when challenged on it then that makes them far much more of a POS than I was for simply making the observation in the first place. 
 @Eòlach It wasn't the place. If was venting about being in a active shooting, i don't what to here your opinions on FPS games because i played doom a week ago.

https://5dollah.click/media/230aa507-80d0-47af-aced-da1216518f06/image.png?name=image.png 
 Nobody cares about Doom or your insistent correlation between violent urges and sexual urges which we've already established are nothing alike. If you're a sexual abuse victim then the last thing you want is to be propagating the means for further people to be abused. 
 @Eòlach As a sexual abuse victim, drawings are the least of my concern. I can tell you were never molested, even CSA victims that hate lolicon have more tact then you. 
 It really is none of your business whether I've been diddled or not, not that it makes what I've said any more or less relevant. I've made my response in accordance to their own and whether they've been diddled or not had absolutely nothing to do with it. 

You don't think posting a screenshot of what I've said with the express purpose of naming and shaming me while retracting visibility of what I was replying to hadn't been a bit tactless on their part either?