Oddbean new post about login | logout Addressing why the illustration and distribution of lolicon is deeply immoral and something that should not be encouraged is to prevent the creation of further abusers by making substitute CSAM readily available. If they're going to say Lolicon is okay and then hide behind the fact they were abused when challenged on it then that makes them far much more of a POS than I was for simply making the observation in the first place.
@Eòlach It wasn't the place. If was venting about being in a active shooting, i don't what to here your opinions on FPS games because i played doom a week ago. https://5dollah.click/media/230aa507-80d0-47af-aced-da1216518f06/image.png?name=image.png
Nobody cares about Doom or your insistent correlation between violent urges and sexual urges which we've already established are nothing alike. If you're a sexual abuse victim then the last thing you want is to be propagating the means for further people to be abused.
@Eòlach As a sexual abuse victim, drawings are the least of my concern. I can tell you were never molested, even CSA victims that hate lolicon have more tact then you.
It really is none of your business whether I've been diddled or not, not that it makes what I've said any more or less relevant. I've made my response in accordance to their own and whether they've been diddled or not had absolutely nothing to do with it. You don't think posting a screenshot of what I've said with the express purpose of naming and shaming me while retracting visibility of what I was replying to hadn't been a bit tactless on their part either?
