I don't disagree with how you use it in your article. I am saying "Bitcoin, not crypto", "Bitcoin, not blockchain" is correct. That's what you focus on.

The slight part that is wrong: "I am writing this in the hopes that some of you, dear fiat bros, will finally understand that bitcoin is not only different from all of 
"crypto," but that it is different from all other currencies, your 
beloved government-issued shitcoins included."

Bitcoin is crypto, but it is unique. With currencies, you said it correctly (different from all OTHER cryptocurrencies".

But otherwise, the article is good and that's not the use I've been referring to in the post. You simply state that we should focus on what is important and not all the shit noise around it. With that I mostly agree.

We need to use correct words and be factually correct. There is a way to have a good punchline, get the message without being factually incorrect (in this case - the facts are the Schelling point of the meaning of the words, see:

nostr:nevent1qywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnr09cxsetjwp6ku6eww3hkgcte9uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7qgmwaehxw309ahx7um5wghx7unpdenk2urfd3kzuer9wchszxnhwden5te0dehhxarj9ecxcetzvd5xz6tw9ehhyee0qyd8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn6v43x2er9v5hxxmr0w4jz7qgnwaehxw309ahkvenrdpskjm3wwp6kytcpzdmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ue0qyd8wumn8ghj7urewfsk66ty9enxjct5dfskvtnrdakj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxxatjwfjkuapwveukjtcqypmay88z2e6d8umvlk29nc0rj03evgwrqudsmyhdww7ppwdjqt4lykmmnwh