I was just thinking that having another Nostr dev testing your entire software in a reproducible and extendable way and giving you productive feedback is more valuable than just haphazardly receiving bug reports from end users.

But I don't know if anyone would agree enough that they'd pay money for it, or if they just want to stick with user-submitted issues. We can see that there isn't actually any direct financial incentive for Nostr devs, to ensure that their software works reliably well. It's a cost that they can't easily pass on, and more something that they would have to desire for its own sake.

For the record, I haven't yet formally tested any Nostr products. #Alexandria will be the first.