Oddbean new post about | logout
 What about  "fork" ?   .. I love this feature on  #Amethyst   .. basically copy the contents of a note into a new one and show linkage to the original  ..  
 I dunno exactly what fork is doing.  If it just makes a new note as a copy of an existing note, with a link in the new note, that is fine.  If it is using kind 1010 event versioning, that won't be recognized by other clients meaning it creates broken experiences. 
 nostr:nevent1qqst7f7cdqvfhlvuvakqd39twqj0aw2l6kvsf2w2hmt3w4r6fwv80pspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvuhsygz67pu5vp4ptdtyrcj65g7sft6vkrtate5tz89vk3l9dfrf3l9gcspsgqqqqqqsnvksjw 
 There is a subtle difference :

In #Amethyst , when I fork a note , it is presented to me as a copy , ready for the edit .. which is convenience ..but the crucial thing is there is a (system generated)  link to the original note , which as a user I am abstained from edititing because the link shows up after I already posted ..  I need to check if the link is visible in #gossip .. 

 In a way , I am forced to link new note to  to the original . I guess that is the subtle difference between copy/paste and fork ! 
 Here is a forked note ... I dunno exactly what fork is doing.  If it just makes a new note as a copy of an existing note, with a link in the new note, that is fine.  If it is using kind 1010 event versioning, that won't be recognized by other clients meaning it creates broken experiences. 
 It is a kind1.  How is this better than copy-paste?