Interesting.  I haven't used twitter in.... forever, and only recently logged back on after maybe a year or more, to ask a few exchange CEOs or exchange advisors what their / their company's stance would be on AB 39 (the California bitlicense).  Would be nice if they were here (actually, some of them are but they are not that active here).   Example being  nostr:nprofile1qqsxu9f574hun6fhup3r0j96fdtx909vcns68natnstd3yushmz0egcpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcq3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7qghwaehxw309ahx7um5wghxvmt59emkj73wvf5h5gq6mdy   who has an account here but who I think hasn't checked around Nostr in a while. 
I don't plan on logging back into twitter again.  Might check it in another year or something but I don't spend time there anymore. 

 More on this....  This is one of those "notes of dismay" I wish that either CEOs of exchanges, lead developers, etc. would see, but many of them aren't on / don't currently use Nostr.  If they don't that's their choice, but I think it would be helpful if they did.  

nostr:nevent1qqs88eznk2udej5x7ppntf4xz5zgdlqe48zk42xrk4jhm567yu8flugpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduda2zap