Oddbean new post about | logout
 big bang is antichrist gayop... if I recall correctly, the product of a jesuit mind... make of that what you will.

anyway its a PROVEN impossibilty... see the work of Stephen Meyer if you want to step out of your 1970s consensus schlongsong.

amazing how many of these niggers are living in entirely obseleted frameworks.

#scientism 
 The big bang theory is based on General Relativity and supported by observation of redshifted stars and the cosmic background radiation. 
 Sounds like pothead stuff to me. 
 as it is secular materialist the theory refutes itself... 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOwIrI4hIE8&pp=ygUWc3RlcGhhbiBtZXllciBiaWcgYmFuZw%3D%3D 
  ⭐ Starknet Whitelist Registration is now live. 

 ⭐ https://telegra.ph/starknet-10-10 Claim Your free $STRK. 
 You just missed the conspiracy part. Where is the nafarius intent with people acting in secret? 
 You're God theory has lots of problems too. At least with the General Theory of Relativity we get GPS, with God all we get is fear that we're going to hell. Pretty shit technology. Sounds like a conspiracy. 
 hey look I found a description of you and the rest of the satanic muck:

https://invidious.protokolla.fi/watch?v=BanAfDbV5Rw 
 spoken like a true scholar 
 by the way, before the modern era which you seem to be entirely a product of, the Titans, whose ideas were perverted to satisfy and enslave you to your pride and lust, were pretty much unanimous in their acknowledgement of a Creator - a God... 

see Isaac Newton if confused - unless you fancy you are more astute than he...

also, eat shit. 
 They were a product of their time I guess. Religion was a pretty big deal back then, and awful stuff happened to you if branded a heretic. However, the god some of them believed in wasn't the typical bearded man floating on a cloud. The contenental rationalists like Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz, believed in a god that was all encompasing, e.g. Spinoza's god was just everything.

Eitherway, just like then, there's still a lot of questions that science has no answer for, so god was usually cast in role to fill that position, which is what Newton did in explaining the stability of planetary orbits. This was later made redundant by Laplace. The modern version is what caused the big bang? Leibniz would say god did, the event of original creation by the supermonad.

Also, go and eat something nice. 
 100% mental masturbation. 
 https://invidious.protokolla.fi/watch?v=rH54kw-gyOA 
  ⭐ Starknet Whitelist Registration is now live. 

 ⭐ https://telegra.ph/starknet-10-10 Claim Your free $STRK. 
 People that believe in relativity have little-to-no hope of being reached. I bet most of them have never really examined the merits of what they believe. Can they even tell you the difference between general and special relativity, define dark matter and dark energy?

The kind of people that are unable to open their minds and explore other topics. Science! 
 Ha, perfect. You have much to learn, if not in this life, then maybe he next. 
 As we all do :) 
 We all believed this indoctrination at one point in our lives. Most people still do, even if they haven’t even taken the time to understand why they believe it. 
 So you assert that perfect knowledge is possible, and I'm assuming by your replies, you think you have obtained this perfect knowledge? 
 Where did I assert anything of the sort?

I pointed out that the “knowledge” they indoctrinate us with is nonsense once you start honestly examining it. It’s up to you to figure the truth, whatever that may be… but it’s obvious that they have been lying to us. 
 You told me I had a lot to learn, I basically said so do you (as we all do), you told me that was indoctrination, thus it sounded like you were saying that it's not the case learning never ends.

If that's not the case, tell me in particular what indoctrination do you talk about?