Lightning foi um erro até o próprio nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hs6ysq3u afirma isso ele que foi o responsável direto pelo segwit diz que temos qie reduzir os blocos do bitcoin pra 300 kb. E ela tá morrendo a maioria das pessoas não rodam seu próprio node até o nostr:nprofile1qqsw433swk0rzwpjcngpzwu7zzpz08asa7n2nn5pek573gmxkjvgkjqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6mmd9upn7m4t teve problemas com o node dele imagina um novato. Sua solução é custodial assim como voce pensa em trazer novos usuários para o nostr com e-mail e senha.
https://image.nostr.build/93b075e6035ec30b25955ef26c7dbffbb1b9cd5ef60222cf1539255e5836b07f.jpg

https://image.nostr.build/3b3a571a0a6178c5c993104213861c1d7ab1789467701bcff7651d70d180954a.jpg

 

 Lightning was not a mistake 

 Segwit was a mistake (according to you)without it lightning would not be possible. Well after 8 years we still stuck here and you want to go back to 300kb block size. Make things make sense Luke we should have listened to Paul and activated Bip300 we would have scalability, privacy and self custody.
https://image.nostr.build/eeabd0e8d756beca14596ba443d0c3d422c90207087de6d592ad0916b8dbf8d5.jpg
https://image.nostr.build/ab4c3f9d79e6b1957b0b7653b2bc30496566a9ad299c4193201eb356154e2a13.jpg
Look around most of us are using custodial wallets for lightning on nostr and it is stuck for years the maximum capacity toped at 5k. 

 Yes, I hope we have Drivechain.  

 No, segwit also wasn't a mistake. Just increasing the block size limit 

 You just say that because you want to censor ordinals transactions I don't believe segwit would work without a blocksize increase we would be on a worse situation than 2017.
We could have smaller blocksize if we had drivechains all the transactions would be done on a sidechain and the base chain would be just a settlement layer.