Oddbean new post about | logout
 I didnt vote. but if i had, this would have been a factor, even though I strongly doubt Ross will be freed

nostr:nevent1qqsqp5fyx9f0xeqr67unpw89h2rkdz3zggdk7hl9xlu657ecpp0wx2cpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3qrtlqca8r6auyaw5n5h3l5422dm4sry5dzfee4696fqe8s6qgudksxpqqqqqqzthgm5z 
 Oh bless their hearts 
nostr:nevent1qqs9aytc3hcxhuvgpqfja4293wm58lgc4e9yg5plx38z0ylk04afmpqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hsygppksv3qtdgls96jpyy4mynf064k74u7a0wmvu3yn5dwhjfraq6tcpsgqqqqqqsg6nl53 
 Still time to vote 
 👆🏼

Election is on tueday and depending on state you live in you might be able to send in a ballot a few days or weeks after lol 
 i think i can remote vote NC? 
 NC is a close race. You should definitely vote. 
 nostr:nevent1qqstkldmyw3le8thdw8xxeupgywx2hs2fztsw5c7h0t83lh6ght8rqcpz3mhxw309ucnydewxqhrqt338g6rsd3e9upzqn4csvgddd8djhrdv63etv7nea2ehp06aj8hdyw6l4q94yhq2htdqvzqqqqqqy4qyfnf 
 good thorough synopsis.
its a shame there are no good viable candidates 
 Dr Shiva and the movement for #TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH exists. 

Please dont say there are no viable candidates. 

Because I actively root for, and advocate change via a bottoms up movement daily. 

#ASKDRSHIVA
#SHIVA4PRESIDENT  
 Isn’t this the dude who claims he invented email or some dumb shit like that? Seems like a scammer. 
 

Yea he did...in 1979 he created a proprietary system at Rutgers University dubbed 'email' with the same inbox/outbox, Cc & BCc, memo, and drafts thaf we see in normal email UI today before the word "email" was first used comercially 

So its technically a semantics argument on whether or not he invented email. 

Do more research Hodl

#SHIVA4PRESIDENT
#SHATTERTHESWARM 
#TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH  
 Email was in use before that 
 Comercially?  
 This is heavily documented in the Brandolini Law archives. You can find more details there. 
 Email was invented for public use in the 1990s, with the advent of webmail and email clients. Prior to this, email was primarily used by academics, researchers, and government agencies connected to the ARPANET network.

Dr Shiva's proprietary inbox/outbox system was used in and documented 1979 and was dubbed 'email'....so its really a semantical arguement. 

Ray Tomlinson's system did not have inbox/outbox BCc, Cc, memos, drafts etc...it was a simple text messenger. 

Brandolini law does not apply here. Lol 
 As military technology with a horrible UX/UI  

Shiva was the 1st to make a proprietary system for commercial use. 


nostr:nevent1qqsvkt890yded8aunlsejp58429lqce7xeyyueqguwuacpxgc9l8qvspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygppksv3qtdgls96jpyy4mynf064k74u7a0wmvu3yn5dwhjfraq6tcpsgqqqqqqse0h34f 
 

Yea he did...in 1979 he created a proprietary system at Rutgers University dubbed 'email' with the same inbox/outbox, Cc & BCc, memo, and drafts thaf we see in normal email UI today before the word "email" was first used comercially 

So its technically a semantics argument on whether or not he invented email. 

Do more research Hodl

#SHIVA4PRESIDENT
#SHATTERTHESWARM 
#TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH 
nostr:nevent1qqsqzgwpux85qurzc3gq37d864drqehmgqkt5qlfm0hjc44e2t9pqcspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygq6lcx8fc7h0p8t4ya9u0a92jnwavqe9rgjwwdw3wjgxfuxsz8rd5psgqqqqqqsrzk2n3 
 Like I said, it's a shame there are no good viable candidates 
 What do you mean by 'viable', when elections are selections? 


Yea, we dont need Dr. Shiva to win the election, just to awaken the consciousness of ppl in America that used to be so vibrant and militant.

Today ppl are all to quick to outsource their rights and freedoms to demagogues..

No more!  Its about awakening the collective conscience to#SHATTERTHESWARM 

#SHIVA4PRESIDENT 
#TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH 
#ASKDRSHIVA



nostr:nevent1qqstyjrqg8gzxn256pwk8npgv3l9ufazd9ta2y6exv7fe8fhwm93epspz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygppksv3qtdgls96jpyy4mynf064k74u7a0wmvu3yn5dwhjfraq6tcpsgqqqqqqsqgfrh3 
 good thorough synopsis.
its a shame there are no good viable candidates 
 Dr Shiva and the movement for #TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH exists. 

Please dont say there are no viable candidates. 

Because I actively root for, and advocate change via a bottoms up movement daily. 

#ASKDRSHIVA
#SHIVA4PRESIDENT  
 Isn’t this the dude who claims he invented email or some dumb shit like that? Seems like a scammer. 
 

Yea he did...in 1979 he created a proprietary system at Rutgers University dubbed 'email' with the same inbox/outbox, Cc & BCc, memo, and drafts thaf we see in normal email UI today before the word "email" was first used comercially 

So its technically a semantics argument on whether or not he invented email. 

Do more research Hodl

#SHIVA4PRESIDENT
#SHATTERTHESWARM 
#TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH  
 Email was in use before that 
 Comercially?  
 This is heavily documented in the Brandolini Law archives. You can find more details there. 
 Email was invented for public use in the 1990s, with the advent of webmail and email clients. Prior to this, email was primarily used by academics, researchers, and government agencies connected to the ARPANET network.

Dr Shiva's proprietary inbox/outbox system was used in and documented 1979 and was dubbed 'email'....so its really a semantical arguement. 

Ray Tomlinson's system did not have inbox/outbox BCc, Cc, memos, drafts etc...it was a simple text messenger. 

Brandolini law does not apply here. Lol 
 As military technology with a horrible UX/UI  

Shiva was the 1st to make a proprietary system for commercial use. 


nostr:nevent1qqsvkt890yded8aunlsejp58429lqce7xeyyueqguwuacpxgc9l8qvspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygppksv3qtdgls96jpyy4mynf064k74u7a0wmvu3yn5dwhjfraq6tcpsgqqqqqqse0h34f 
 

Yea he did...in 1979 he created a proprietary system at Rutgers University dubbed 'email' with the same inbox/outbox, Cc & BCc, memo, and drafts thaf we see in normal email UI today before the word "email" was first used comercially 

So its technically a semantics argument on whether or not he invented email. 

Do more research Hodl

#SHIVA4PRESIDENT
#SHATTERTHESWARM 
#TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH 
nostr:nevent1qqsqzgwpux85qurzc3gq37d864drqehmgqkt5qlfm0hjc44e2t9pqcspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygq6lcx8fc7h0p8t4ya9u0a92jnwavqe9rgjwwdw3wjgxfuxsz8rd5psgqqqqqqsrzk2n3 
 Like I said, it's a shame there are no good viable candidates 
 What do you mean by 'viable', when elections are selections? 


Yea, we dont need Dr. Shiva to win the election, just to awaken the consciousness of ppl in America that used to be so vibrant and militant.

Today ppl are all to quick to outsource their rights and freedoms to demagogues..

No more!  Its about awakening the collective conscience to#SHATTERTHESWARM 

#SHIVA4PRESIDENT 
#TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH 
#ASKDRSHIVA



nostr:nevent1qqstyjrqg8gzxn256pwk8npgv3l9ufazd9ta2y6exv7fe8fhwm93epspz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygppksv3qtdgls96jpyy4mynf064k74u7a0wmvu3yn5dwhjfraq6tcpsgqqqqqqsqgfrh3 
 nostr:note17fl59k52stgvat7fsxzf049tj204xj8s5wvmd7gea7kynp588jxqszlw45 
 No he didn’t. You won’t find any record of that because it never happened. 
 you're right, thanks for calling me out.

i misinterpreted a third party reference to the time frame. he was "considering" the matter AFTER election day.

i think my campaign promise statement is still correct, given the state of politics, and i was in no way trying to pick on Trump specifically, but i do find it hard to believe that he would actually free Ross if elected.

i also find it hard to believe that Harris will be beneficial to the American people. politicians will lie to get votes, and yet people lean into their confirmation bias and vote to "end fascism" or "free Ross"! 
 If trump wins Ross will be granted clemency 
 i admire your confidence but i don't trust Trump's track record in walking the talk. unless it's about restricting the rights of people he doesn't like. 
 Who’s rights has he restricted? 
 "grab 'em by the pussy." 
 It confuses me how you think that’s an appropriate answer to the question I asked you. 
 you're perfectly capable of DYOR like a big boy Bitcoiner but i think your confirmation bias in this instance is beyond repair. 
 You made a claim. I’m asking you to back that claim. You can’t back it though so now you are trying to project onto me. 
 That person clearly has brain damage from all the shit they fed them

can’t you see the mental disorder they have just by their username alone 💀 
 queer people exist ooo scary. it's not new, you just want to believe it's because i've been propagandized by the modern state so you can dismiss me and people like me.

you do you, but please recognize that you are NOT me and that difference is still meaningful. understanding > dismissal. 
 "gay" is real. "queer" is fake. 
 semantics will not save you. 
 neither will queer theory 
 queerness > theories discussing queerness 
 i strongly doubt i can convince you of anything so i am declining to continue. i gave an example of Trump directly admitting to a violation of another person's rights, to the adulation of his peers no less.

what seems to be the case is that you agree with various Trump policy points, such that you can't see where other's rights are being infringed by those policies. that's a YOU problem, so "projection" is not the issue. 
 This convo was as pointless as I expected 
 wasn't even fun. 
 Thats nothing to do with governance, the constitution, etc. Civil issue 
 That character flaw that is not fit for a figurehead position. 

Imagine having daughters and advocating for that guy... 
 this sort of thing speaks to his character and opinion of others. if he is to govern, his personhood has a lot to do with governance. 
 If the ~$200M the crypto industry forked up to both parties does not do it, then nothing short of a bottoms up movement will #freeross 
#truthfreedomhealth
#shiva4president
#askdrshiva

https://image.nostr.build/3ef5885b6207e2064fd281f570c4b84663c6ccf9bb46f5baf26f25c17726b5af.jpg

https://image.nostr.build/6d61155d073b333ac195cb92261351c2309c898c74575d9a3db87955e6b29991.jpg


nostr:nevent1qqsvtmrs6wfckvr7velslvjwa6l8xl3xy6vydw3pe4ka9ck9lr7vezsqg7e43 
 #TRUTH 
nostr:nevent1qqswt5xpjpvnju7utyj35ysquum37rhyu4u35xuu96chpa7utnwj2jcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgs9g6grpj9wychl8h2slr0n80lr49fcyjdtgaskdkvtl7uyv89ru8srqsqqqqqpzawwdt 
 No he didn’t. You won’t find any record of that because it never happened. 
 you're right, thanks for calling me out.

i misinterpreted a third party reference to the time frame. he was "considering" the matter AFTER election day.

i think my campaign promise statement is still correct, given the state of politics, and i was in no way trying to pick on Trump specifically, but i do find it hard to believe that he would actually free Ross if elected.

i also find it hard to believe that Harris will be beneficial to the American people. politicians will lie to get votes, and yet people lean into their confirmation bias and vote to "end fascism" or "free Ross"! 
 If trump wins Ross will be granted clemency 
 i admire your confidence but i don't trust Trump's track record in walking the talk. unless it's about restricting the rights of people he doesn't like. 
 Who’s rights has he restricted? 
 "grab 'em by the pussy." 
 It confuses me how you think that’s an appropriate answer to the question I asked you. 
 you're perfectly capable of DYOR like a big boy Bitcoiner but i think your confirmation bias in this instance is beyond repair. 
 You made a claim. I’m asking you to back that claim. You can’t back it though so now you are trying to project onto me. 
 That person clearly has brain damage from all the shit they fed them

can’t you see the mental disorder they have just by their username alone 💀 
 queer people exist ooo scary. it's not new, you just want to believe it's because i've been propagandized by the modern state so you can dismiss me and people like me.

you do you, but please recognize that you are NOT me and that difference is still meaningful. understanding > dismissal. 
 "gay" is real. "queer" is fake. 
 semantics will not save you. 
 neither will queer theory 
 queerness > theories discussing queerness 
 i strongly doubt i can convince you of anything so i am declining to continue. i gave an example of Trump directly admitting to a violation of another person's rights, to the adulation of his peers no less.

what seems to be the case is that you agree with various Trump policy points, such that you can't see where other's rights are being infringed by those policies. that's a YOU problem, so "projection" is not the issue. 
 This convo was as pointless as I expected 
 wasn't even fun. 
 Thats nothing to do with governance, the constitution, etc. Civil issue 
 That character flaw that is not fit for a figurehead position. 

Imagine having daughters and advocating for that guy... 
 this sort of thing speaks to his character and opinion of others. if he is to govern, his personhood has a lot to do with governance. 
 If the ~$200M the crypto industry forked up to both parties does not do it, then nothing short of a bottoms up movement will #freeross 
#truthfreedomhealth
#shiva4president
#askdrshiva

https://image.nostr.build/3ef5885b6207e2064fd281f570c4b84663c6ccf9bb46f5baf26f25c17726b5af.jpg

https://image.nostr.build/6d61155d073b333ac195cb92261351c2309c898c74575d9a3db87955e6b29991.jpg


nostr:nevent1qqsvtmrs6wfckvr7velslvjwa6l8xl3xy6vydw3pe4ka9ck9lr7vezsqg7e43 
 #TRUTH 
nostr:nevent1qqswt5xpjpvnju7utyj35ysquum37rhyu4u35xuu96chpa7utnwj2jcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgs9g6grpj9wychl8h2slr0n80lr49fcyjdtgaskdkvtl7uyv89ru8srqsqqqqqpzawwdt 
 "grab 'em by the pussy." 
 It confuses me how you think that’s an appropriate answer to the question I asked you. 
 you're perfectly capable of DYOR like a big boy Bitcoiner but i think your confirmation bias in this instance is beyond repair. 
 You made a claim. I’m asking you to back that claim. You can’t back it though so now you are trying to project onto me. 
 That person clearly has brain damage from all the shit they fed them

can’t you see the mental disorder they have just by their username alone 💀 
 queer people exist ooo scary. it's not new, you just want to believe it's because i've been propagandized by the modern state so you can dismiss me and people like me.

you do you, but please recognize that you are NOT me and that difference is still meaningful. understanding > dismissal. 
 "gay" is real. "queer" is fake. 
 semantics will not save you. 
 neither will queer theory 
 queerness > theories discussing queerness 
 i strongly doubt i can convince you of anything so i am declining to continue. i gave an example of Trump directly admitting to a violation of another person's rights, to the adulation of his peers no less.

what seems to be the case is that you agree with various Trump policy points, such that you can't see where other's rights are being infringed by those policies. that's a YOU problem, so "projection" is not the issue. 
 This convo was as pointless as I expected 
 wasn't even fun. 
 Thats nothing to do with governance, the constitution, etc. Civil issue 
 That character flaw that is not fit for a figurehead position. 

Imagine having daughters and advocating for that guy... 
 this sort of thing speaks to his character and opinion of others. if he is to govern, his personhood has a lot to do with governance. 
 It confuses me how you think that’s an appropriate answer to the question I asked you. 
 you're perfectly capable of DYOR like a big boy Bitcoiner but i think your confirmation bias in this instance is beyond repair. 
 You made a claim. I’m asking you to back that claim. You can’t back it though so now you are trying to project onto me. 
 That person clearly has brain damage from all the shit they fed them

can’t you see the mental disorder they have just by their username alone 💀 
 queer people exist ooo scary. it's not new, you just want to believe it's because i've been propagandized by the modern state so you can dismiss me and people like me.

you do you, but please recognize that you are NOT me and that difference is still meaningful. understanding > dismissal. 
 "gay" is real. "queer" is fake. 
 semantics will not save you. 
 neither will queer theory 
 queerness > theories discussing queerness 
 i strongly doubt i can convince you of anything so i am declining to continue. i gave an example of Trump directly admitting to a violation of another person's rights, to the adulation of his peers no less.

what seems to be the case is that you agree with various Trump policy points, such that you can't see where other's rights are being infringed by those policies. that's a YOU problem, so "projection" is not the issue. 
 This convo was as pointless as I expected 
 wasn't even fun. 
 If the ~$200M the crypto industry forked up to both parties does not do it, then nothing short of a bottoms up movement will #freeross 
#truthfreedomhealth
#shiva4president
#askdrshiva

https://image.nostr.build/3ef5885b6207e2064fd281f570c4b84663c6ccf9bb46f5baf26f25c17726b5af.jpg

https://image.nostr.build/6d61155d073b333ac195cb92261351c2309c898c74575d9a3db87955e6b29991.jpg


nostr:nevent1qqsvtmrs6wfckvr7velslvjwa6l8xl3xy6vydw3pe4ka9ck9lr7vezsqg7e43 
 #TRUTH 
nostr:nevent1qqswt5xpjpvnju7utyj35ysquum37rhyu4u35xuu96chpa7utnwj2jcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgs9g6grpj9wychl8h2slr0n80lr49fcyjdtgaskdkvtl7uyv89ru8srqsqqqqqpzawwdt 
 Isn’t this the dude who claims he invented email or some dumb shit like that? Seems like a scammer. 
 

Yea he did...in 1979 he created a proprietary system at Rutgers University dubbed 'email' with the same inbox/outbox, Cc & BCc, memo, and drafts thaf we see in normal email UI today before the word "email" was first used comercially 

So its technically a semantics argument on whether or not he invented email. 

Do more research Hodl

#SHIVA4PRESIDENT
#SHATTERTHESWARM 
#TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH  
 Email was in use before that 
 Comercially?  
 This is heavily documented in the Brandolini Law archives. You can find more details there. 
 Email was invented for public use in the 1990s, with the advent of webmail and email clients. Prior to this, email was primarily used by academics, researchers, and government agencies connected to the ARPANET network.

Dr Shiva's proprietary inbox/outbox system was used in and documented 1979 and was dubbed 'email'....so its really a semantical arguement. 

Ray Tomlinson's system did not have inbox/outbox BCc, Cc, memos, drafts etc...it was a simple text messenger. 

Brandolini law does not apply here. Lol 
 As military technology with a horrible UX/UI  

Shiva was the 1st to make a proprietary system for commercial use. 


nostr:nevent1qqsvkt890yded8aunlsejp58429lqce7xeyyueqguwuacpxgc9l8qvspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygppksv3qtdgls96jpyy4mynf064k74u7a0wmvu3yn5dwhjfraq6tcpsgqqqqqqse0h34f 
 

Yea he did...in 1979 he created a proprietary system at Rutgers University dubbed 'email' with the same inbox/outbox, Cc & BCc, memo, and drafts thaf we see in normal email UI today before the word "email" was first used comercially 

So its technically a semantics argument on whether or not he invented email. 

Do more research Hodl

#SHIVA4PRESIDENT
#SHATTERTHESWARM 
#TRUTHFREEDOMHEALTH 
nostr:nevent1qqsqzgwpux85qurzc3gq37d864drqehmgqkt5qlfm0hjc44e2t9pqcspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygq6lcx8fc7h0p8t4ya9u0a92jnwavqe9rgjwwdw3wjgxfuxsz8rd5psgqqqqqqsrzk2n3 
 "gay" is real. "queer" is fake. 
 semantics will not save you. 
 neither will queer theory 
 queerness > theories discussing queerness