you're right, thanks for calling me out.
i misinterpreted a third party reference to the time frame. he was "considering" the matter AFTER election day.
i think my campaign promise statement is still correct, given the state of politics, and i was in no way trying to pick on Trump specifically, but i do find it hard to believe that he would actually free Ross if elected.
i also find it hard to believe that Harris will be beneficial to the American people. politicians will lie to get votes, and yet people lean into their confirmation bias and vote to "end fascism" or "free Ross"!
If trump wins Ross will be granted clemency
i admire your confidence but i don't trust Trump's track record in walking the talk. unless it's about restricting the rights of people he doesn't like.
Who’s rights has he restricted?
"grab 'em by the pussy."
It confuses me how you think that’s an appropriate answer to the question I asked you.
you're perfectly capable of DYOR like a big boy Bitcoiner but i think your confirmation bias in this instance is beyond repair.
You made a claim. I’m asking you to back that claim. You can’t back it though so now you are trying to project onto me.
That person clearly has brain damage from all the shit they fed them
can’t you see the mental disorder they have just by their username alone 💀
queer people exist ooo scary. it's not new, you just want to believe it's because i've been propagandized by the modern state so you can dismiss me and people like me.
you do you, but please recognize that you are NOT me and that difference is still meaningful. understanding > dismissal.
"gay" is real. "queer" is fake.
semantics will not save you.
neither will queer theory
queerness > theories discussing queerness
i strongly doubt i can convince you of anything so i am declining to continue. i gave an example of Trump directly admitting to a violation of another person's rights, to the adulation of his peers no less.
what seems to be the case is that you agree with various Trump policy points, such that you can't see where other's rights are being infringed by those policies. that's a YOU problem, so "projection" is not the issue.
This convo was as pointless as I expected
Thats nothing to do with governance, the constitution, etc. Civil issue
That character flaw that is not fit for a figurehead position.
Imagine having daughters and advocating for that guy...
this sort of thing speaks to his character and opinion of others. if he is to govern, his personhood has a lot to do with governance.
Oddbean new post about login | logout 
