The money is still broken. 

 From what I read, it's capped at 650€/month? 

 I’m not sure why someone without children would want to be punished for not having children. 

The incentive structure seems misaligned.

>“A lifetime personal tax income exemption for women who give birth and raise at least 4 children”

What mother of four could or would be working for a significant income while raising 4+ children? Not impossible, but certainly seems to incentivize many children and continuing to work as much as possible simultaneously.

> It’s fair to assume the funds come from taxation and inflation, which in effect forcefully takes money from those who don’t have children and redistributes it towards people who do.

Simultaneously weakening the ability of those without children to own homes (via taxation/inflation needed for the policy to be funded) and effectively raising the price of homes by subsidizing parents doubles the damage to individuals without children.

>Overall it seems to send the message:

“Make more children for the state, or get out of the country as soon as possible”

I think I’d take the latter.

nostr:note1s6qlle2yp35j8kjyweqenjxlfen5wmlrq87kkhjdx6np8s6890zqsx56ql 

 People of working age are disappearing by millions every year... 

 I don't like stealing from those who worked for the money to pay someone else, but I support this more than most things governments spend money on.  At least they value life and family. 

 You get more of what you subsidize and less of what you tax  

  Another boom generation